Craft Beer Lover
Registered User
Oh, I forgot...you’re an EXPERT.
Parent was the primary reason the Flyers won their only two Stanley Cups.Clarke, Hextall, Lindros, Giroux with an HM to Parent.
Oh, I forgot...you’re an EXPERT.
Parent was the primary reason the Flyers won their only two Stanley Cups.Clarke, Hextall, Lindros, Giroux with an HM to Parent.
Not surprised at your analysis, being that you looked up his counting statistics, rather than having actually watched him play. He was indeed the best left wing of his era which included Rick Martin, Steve Shutt, and Clark Gillies, and was a two-way and possession wiz. Giroux, not so much.
Clarke, Hextall, Lindros, Giroux with an HM to Parent.
Defintely a sign of my age, but I vividly remember Hextall slashing the F*$% out of Nilsson. and that is Flyer's hockey.Barber was a good player. But even if he was indeed the best LW of his era, he wasn't head & shoulders above everyone else.
How can you possibly put Hextall over Parent?
Defintely a sign of my age, but I vividly remember Hextall slashing the F*$% out of Nilsson. and that is Flyer's hockey.
Parent has the stats and the cups, but I don't know of a "moment" like Hextall has several of.
In fairness to Giroux, that was one player the Flyers did very little with when compared to others. They absolutely shit the bed with him.I forgot...you’re an EXPERT.
I must say, you Claude Giroux apologists are so quite amusing! All this effort to build up a guy who, as captain, led his team to the playoffs a whopping 4 seasons out of 11.
Clarke, Lindros, Parent, Giroux
First 3 were fairly straight forward, #4 was very tough between Giroux/Barber/Howe
As usual 3 easy ones in Clarke, Lindros and Giroux
4th is as usual hard with Barber, McLeish, Parent, Hextall, Propp and even a few others
How is McLeish not an option?
5th in games played
5th in points
5th in playoffs games played
4th in playoffs points
How can Bernie Parent, the primary reason your organization has any Stanley Cups at all, not be on your list?
How can Bernie Parent, the primary reason your organization has any Stanley Cups at all, not be on your list?
“Flyers’ hockey” is the reason your organization hasn’t won a Stanley Cup in 48 seasons.Defintely a sign of my age, but I vividly remember Hextall slashing the F*$% out of Nilsson. and that is Flyer's hockey.
Parent has the stats and the cups, but I don't know of a "moment" like Hextall has several of.
Sami Kapanen in for Slaney and you have my picks.Robert Esche, Simon Gagne, Rod Brind'Amour, John Slaney
I'm not a flyers fan. My team has won more cups in the last 30 years than any other.“Flyers’ hockey” is the reason your organization hasn’t won a Stanley Cup in 48 seasons.
In keeping up with the times, Detroit won those four Stanley Cups with speed and talent. Philadelphia has followed the same size and physicality recipe for 48 years, despite the fact that the game has totally revolutionized since then.I'm not a flyers fan. My team has won more cups in the last 30 years than any other.
Please re-visit your list of champions over the last 30 years and discover Detroit does not have the most either...In keeping up with the times, Detroit won those four Stanley Cups with speed and talent. Philadelphia has followed the same size and physicality recipe for 48 years, despite the fact that the game has totally revolutionized since then.
Please revisit which year we're in.Please re-visit your list of champions over the last 30 years and discover Detroit does not have the most either...