Hughes
Pettersson didnt even show up until he was 20, but im sure nobody will consider that when looking at their career stats
Logic would tell you thatI’m sure many people are factoring age in as well.
I don’t think Jack’s a bust but I just like EP’s tools better when I’m thinking about career projections.Logic would tell you that
but in sports a lot of people simply go off reputation. Jack had a poor statistical rookie year while Petterssons rookie year was great
A lot wont care that one was two years taught in a pro league before his debut. I bet Jack wont have a single chance in this poll, people consider him a bust already because hes not scoring like McDavid and Matthews
Petey only had 1 extra season before he made the team and his D+1 was a record setting season while Hughes was clearly not ready to jump right in.Hughes
Pettersson didnt even show up until he was 20, but im sure nobody will consider that when looking at their career stats
Peteys draft season was split between the Swedish Jr and tier 2 not much better than the USNDP playing against college teams. One was also a 1st overall who had been hyped as better than AM, the other was considered a reach and hated by a lot of Nuck fans.Logic would tell you that
but in sports a lot of people simply go off reputation. Jack had a poor statistical rookie year while Petterssons rookie year was great
A lot wont care that one was two years taught in a pro league before his debut. I bet Jack wont have a single chance in this poll, people consider him a bust already because hes not scoring like McDavid and Matthews
Peteys draft season was split between the Swedish Jr and tier 2 not much better than the USNDP playing against college teams. One was also a 1st overall who had been hyped as better than AM, the other was considered a reach and hated by a lot of Nuck fans.
Trying to discredit Petey because he played part of his season in tier 2 is weak.
He's not a bust at all but anyway you slice it using their stats factoring in age and Petey still has better numbers. If this Jacks rookie year in D+2 he's still producing at half Peteys numbers and both are tiny so can't say Petey has an edge there either.Logic would tell you that
but in sports a lot of people simply go off reputation. Jack had a poor statistical rookie year while Petterssons rookie year was great
A lot wont care that one was two years taught in a pro league before his debut. I bet Jack wont have a single chance in this poll, people consider him a bust already because hes not scoring like McDavid and Matthews
I'm not your slave do it yourself. There was tons of talk about him being the best prospect ever out of the program. Why the hell would I make that up? Dig around here or maybe someone who knows how to search this forum better than me will be nice enough to find the poll and different threads.Liar.
Find me the posts or articles hyping Hughes to be better than matthews.
I wasnt aiming my comments at you btwI don’t think Jack’s a bust but I just like EP’s tools better when I’m thinking about career projections.
Discredit?Peteys draft season was split between the Swedish Jr and tier 2 not much better than the USNDP playing against college teams. One was also a 1st overall who had been hyped as better than AM, the other was considered a reach and hated by a lot of Nuck fans.
Trying to discredit Petey because he played part of his season in tier 2 is weak.
Jack's season next year would be the one compared to Elias' rookie year; so we shall see how they compare (hopefully NJ can surround Jack a bit better before then)He's not a bust at all but anyway you slice it using their stats factoring in age and Petey still has better numbers. If this Jacks rookie year in D+2 he's still producing at half Peteys numbers and both are tiny so can't say Petey has an edge there either.
Hughes
Pettersson didnt even show up until he was 20, but im sure nobody will consider that when looking at their career stats
Jack is 19 for the entirety of this season, even if it was 82 games. His birthday is in MayPettersson was 19 at the start of his first season (and scored 10 goals and 17 points in 12 games as a 19 year old), and was in his draft+2 season. This is Hughes' draft +2 season, and due to covid, he's played most of it not far removed from the age Pettersson was to start his.
Jack's season next year would be the one compared to Elias' rookie year; so we shall see how they compare (hopefully NJ can surround Jack a bit better before then)
Jack is 19 for the entirety of this season, even if it was 82 games. His birthday is in May
they arent the same at all. D+ doesnt mean a thing, its about age
Jack's season next year would be the one compared to Elias' rookie year; so we shall see how they compare (hopefully NJ can surround Jack a bit better before then)
Youre comparing their exact days when they started the NHL (this season for Jack) like as if Jack didnt start in the NHL on a worse team at 18, while Pettersson had experience in a foreign pro and junior pro league prior.So whats your argument for Jack Hughes?
All you said was
"Pettersson didnt even show up until he was 20, but im sure nobody will consider that when looking at their career stats"
So you arent making any points in favor of Jack except for age..
Besides, this year should be compared to EP's rookie year. Its his D+2, same with Elias's D+2. In their D+2 seasons, Elias was 19 years 11 months old, Jack at the start of the season was 19 years 8 months old. Thats a 3 month difference aka negligible.