Last edited by a moderator:
This is different though. The others that they hired without interviewing others were former Oilers who were gifted positions out of loyalty and Eakins who had no NHL resume to speak of.
Chiarelli even with his warts is a proven commodity, as successful as you'll find on the open market. I'm sure he would be offered other opportunities if the Oilers don't snag him now.
There's something to be said for doing due diligence but when you have an opportunity to get one of the better GMs on the market, go get him.
I don't disagree that Chiarelli is good hockey man but I just don't want to see the Oilers bring him in tomorrow, give him the keys, then watch him trade 2 or 3 of the young core for "tougher, Bruins like" players.
This is different though. The others that they hired without interviewing others were former Oilers who were gifted positions out of loyalty and Eakins who had no NHL resume to speak of.
Chiarelli even with his warts is a proven commodity, as successful as you'll find on the open market. I'm sure he would be offered other opportunities if the Oilers don't snag him now.
There's something to be said for doing due diligence but when you have an opportunity to get one of the better GMs on the market, go get him.
I don't disagree that Chiarelli is good hockey man but I just don't want to see the Oilers bring him in tomorrow, give him the keys, then watch him trade 2 or 3 of the young core for "tougher, Bruins like" players.
This is different though. The others that they hired without interviewing others were former Oilers who were gifted positions out of loyalty and Eakins who had no NHL resume to speak of.
Chiarelli even with his warts is a proven commodity, as successful as you'll find on the open market. I'm sure he would be offered other opportunities if the Oilers don't snag him now.
There's something to be said for doing due diligence but when you have an opportunity to get one of the better GMs on the market, go get him.
I don't disagree that Chiarelli is good hockey man but I just don't want to see the Oilers bring him in tomorrow, give him the keys, then watch him trade 2 or 3 of the young core for "tougher, Bruins like" players.
I don't disagree that Chiarelli is good hockey man but I just don't want to see the Oilers bring him in tomorrow, give him the keys, then watch him trade 2 or 3 of the young core for "tougher, Bruins like" players.
I would pose the same question that got buried in the last thread to the 'wait and interview multiple people' crowd.
Who are we waiting for? Rutherford?
PC might only be average as an actual GM, but he is the best name out there in regards to bringing a history of success and instant credibility to the Edmonton Oilers, and we need that kind of image makeover in the worst way imaginable.
To the guy saying hiring Chiarelli is a mistake because he's the first person we're interviewing....
Please provide us a list of other GMs who are available and have won a Stanley Cup in the last decade?
Lombardi ain't leaving Los Angeles.
Holland ain't leaving Detroit.
Bowman ain't leaving Chicago.
Ridiculous that posters on this board will complain about Chiarelli. Guys like this are rarely available to be hired. When they are, you pounce on them immediately.
Not liking a guy like Chia is like beggars being choosers
Seguin is not that good. Take away Benn and you have an average player.
His tattoo on his arm is horrendous too.
The Oilers cynic in me says Chiarelli is here only to leverage a better deal from another NHL club (like past UFAs).
Or worse, Nicholson is talking to other people to address due diligence concerns (like Lowe hiring MacT as GM), only to confirm Lowe, MacT and Howson are indeed the "right people".
Please, McJesus, let me be wrong.
Mr. Bean as Head Coach and have the Three Stooges as the assistant coaches.
Ya I don't believe that this is a bad thing, were not going to win with an all skill top 6. We need that size and role players as well as defense and goaltending to have moderate success. Any gm no matter who it if not this year, in the next will realise we need to trade some of our core peices to fill holes in the roster. Unless you want it mact's way where we sit and have "devolpmental" years, which means we suck for the next decade to draft these players to fill the holesChiarelli trading one of the young core is being overblown. The current or next GM is going to have to swing a deal to aquire some defensive and goaltending help.
Ya I don't believe that this is a bad thing, were not going to win with an all skill top 6. We need that size and role players as well as defense and goaltending to have moderate success. Any gm no matter who it if not this year, in the next will realise we need to trade some of our core peices to fill holes in the roster. Unless you want it mact's way where we sit and have "devolpmental" years, which means we suck for the next decade to draft these players to fill the holes
people can't possibly dislike this if he comes here
guy has Stanley Cup pedigree...he know what it takes to win a Cup
I hope he comes in and becomes the boss of MacT...cause once he sees how awful he is, he'll punt him..(probably in some other capacity...like getting coffee for the big boys, it's the Oiler way)
Completely agree.
Oilers fans have to get comfortable with the possibility of Hall or Eberle being moved.
Having McDavid makes that much more palatable.