Empoleon8771
Registered User
I also think people grossly exaggerate the issues with Carter. I think his declining play was as simple as him just being worn down from playing in his first full season in years at age 37. I also think people grossly exaggerate how bad he was when he was worn down. He still had 7 goals and 19 points in 37 games in the last 3 months of the season and 4 goals and 5 points against the Rangers.
I also thought that Carter's analytics really fell off to end last year, but they don't actually seem as bad as I remembered from looking now. Over that same 37 game sample size, his xGF%Rel was pretty much the same as Rust, Matheson and Letang. Both Matheson and Rust have equal or worse analytics than Carter over any sample size you'd want to select as Carter having bad analytics as well. In their last 15 games, Rust had a -9.88% xGF%Rel and Matheson had a -6.62% xGF%Rel, compared to Carter's -5.14% xGF%Rel.
This is actually surprising to me, because I didn't realize that Matheson's analytics cratered to end last year as well.
I also thought that Carter's analytics really fell off to end last year, but they don't actually seem as bad as I remembered from looking now. Over that same 37 game sample size, his xGF%Rel was pretty much the same as Rust, Matheson and Letang. Both Matheson and Rust have equal or worse analytics than Carter over any sample size you'd want to select as Carter having bad analytics as well. In their last 15 games, Rust had a -9.88% xGF%Rel and Matheson had a -6.62% xGF%Rel, compared to Carter's -5.14% xGF%Rel.
This is actually surprising to me, because I didn't realize that Matheson's analytics cratered to end last year as well.