Who's writing him off? I said he hasn't proven anything yet and he clearly isn't as skilled.
Go and pom pom Wilson if you like. I really don't give a ****.
He doesn't pass my eye test. If you don't like it thats your problem.
I'm not pom poming anybody. Wilson got a brief audition on line 1, scored a few then got hurt. Sheary got a brief audition on line 1, scored a few and we're at now. There's no conclusions to be drawn at this point, beyond that both guys did promising work as rookies in short sample sizes.
I don't particularly see what's so threating about the concept of hedging your bets in camp between two players with similar amateur and pro track records. Or even between four players, if you add Sprong and Simon to the mix.
Sheary very well might end up better and a better fit than all of these, but calling it right now is way, way premature. Citing "stickhandling" is the sort of thing people do, then can't wrap their heads around Kevin Hayes scoring as many goals from the third line in two years as Granlund has from the first in four years.
I find it funny People hated Gibbons but like Sheary. In any case, I like the midget, kid has some serious talent and balls.
Brian Gibbons was bad. Speed + nothing.
Even when Sheary was struggling with the size of the opposition for most of the season, he was still deflecting pucks, getting open, finding the open man and things of that nature--none of which Gibbons did. And at the point in his rookie season in which a lot of us started hating the idea of Gibbons in the lineup (which would be at the beginning of March), Sheary was already showing adjustments that Gibbons never showed.