TropicalAntarctica
Registered User
- Oct 9, 2015
- 84
- 5
For that term and price I would rather have Daley.
Assuming Daley wouldn't have taken a discount (which he probably would have because Pennsylvania taxes are lower than Michigan's, and the obvious that he wouldn't have to move to a new city and aclimate to a new locker room on a trainwreck of a team) we saved .85m to downgrade from a very mobile, very good offensively, PPQB and PKer who can play both sides and in the top 4, to a decently mobile, offensively competent, okay PKer who can play both sides on the bottom pair.
I'm not gonna overreact and say I hate it, but I don't get why people aren't pointing at what Daley got from Detroit and how we would have been better off with that.
Assuming Daley wouldn't have taken a discount (which he probably would have because Pennsylvania taxes are lower than Michigan's, and the obvious that he wouldn't have to move to a new city and aclimate to a new locker room on a trainwreck of a team) we saved .85m to downgrade from a very mobile, very good offensively, PPQB and PKer who can play both sides and in the top 4, to a decently mobile, offensively competent, okay PKer who can play both sides on the bottom pair.
I'm not gonna overreact and say I hate it, but I don't get why people aren't pointing at what Daley got from Detroit and how we would have been better off with that.