Juxtaposer
Outro: Divina Comedia
Team plays poorly, argue about who is the worst.
Team plays well, argue about who is the best.
Statement: Brent Burns is not the savior.
Discuss.
Team plays poorly, argue about who is the worst.
Team plays well, argue about who is the best.
Team plays poorly, argue about who is the worst.
Team plays well, argue about who is the best.
To call Thornton a "specialist" isn't accurate at all.
At this point in their careers Marleau is the better player, but Marleau has never been one of the best players in the league like Joe has. He's really never reached that level of play.
Its no coincidence that Marleau started putting up career numbers as soon as Joe was traded here and took over as the #1 Center.
Would you take Sergei Fedorov, Brian Trottier, Steve Yzerman, or Peter Forsberg (all, by the way, much more "well-rounded", as well as talented, players than Marleau) over Wayne Gretzky?
Besides, Thornton is not a specialist in the way that an Andreychuk is.
Marleau is the ultimate complementary player. But Thornton is a franchise player. Thornton has been the best player on his team for how many years in this league? Marleu has held that title maybe once...
But seriously, even though Thornton vs Marleau debates are supposedly about who's the best, they always end up very negative. Really bums me out.
Lots of self love
Is it really? In terms of what he brings to the ice, it's his vision, passing, and puck possession including faceoffs. These are all vital things to have if you can get them obviously but what beyond that does Thornton bring in terms of what he does on the ice?
Marleau is a Selke-caliber defensive player... If you don't believe me believe Elliotte Friedman or Mike Babcock...
That seems so strange, I always thought that Thornton was very good defensively. What is it does he not hustle or does he just lack the instincts on defense? Its just strange to hear a winger be great at defense rather than a top caliber center.
That seems so strange, I always thought that Thornton was very good defensively. What is it does he not hustle or does he just lack the instincts on defense? Its just strange to hear a winger be great at defense rather than a top caliber center.
That seems so strange, I always thought that Thornton was very good defensively. What is it does he not hustle or does he just lack the instincts on defense? Its just strange to hear a winger be great at defense rather than a top caliber center.
Brent Burns needs to play better. He's been a mixed bag. Unleash the beast.
Brent Burns needs to stop hitting the post. He could have been a goal scoring leader on this team, at least, but how many posts has he hit?
Thornton has top-notch hockey IQ; it's his speed, low tempo, and lack of high-end agility that hurts him defensively (it's not a problem when he has the puck).
If you pay attention to Marleau, really follow him all game, you'll notice just how flawless he is in his own zone when the puck is around him. He is a very detail-oriented player.
Thornton has top-notch hockey IQ; it's his speed, low tempo, and lack of high-end agility that hurts him defensively (it's not a problem when he has the puck).
If you pay attention to Marleau, really follow him all game, you'll notice just how flawless he is in his own zone when the puck is around him. He is a very detail-oriented player.
Thanks for the explanation on his defensive tendencies, has his defense, or his intensity on defense dropped off steadily with age, or has he always been like this?
And Marleau's stride.... anyone who plays hockey should be in awe of that power. He gets to top speed so fast and effortlessly.
I remember sometime this season how Marleau was being chased by Duchene and in like two to three strides he completely dusted him. **** was crazy.
I remember sometime this season how Marleau was being chased by Duchene and in like two to three strides he completely dusted him. **** was crazy.
Unless they make a new rule where hockey is played with multiple pucks, puck possession is a vital part to dominating the game.