Prospect Info: Pavel Zacha

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,975
44,634
PA
I mean, Zacha could absolutely play on the wing if Stastny was signed. Plus, you can never have enough centers.

C depth of Hischier, Stastny, Zajac, Zacha, Boyle is really good

Plus, signing him wouldn't affect our cap space enough to even remotely worry about. Its not like he is going to get $10 million for 5 years
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billdo

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,538
13,922
Zacha should be playing at C, and Stastny isn't going to a sign a 2 year contract, ergo his AAV matters. If the Devils could find a way to ditch Zajac, maybe Stastny would be a good option, but as it stands, I don't think he's a great fit - leaving aside the fact that I have no idea why Stastny would sign here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: devilsblood

None Shall Pass

Dano moisturizes
Jul 7, 2007
15,425
11,721
Brooklyn
1. We have more cap space now and in the near future than we can sensibly use.
2. Assuming Zacha will be better than Stastny now or in the near future is a long shot and frankly silly. Especially since Stastny's career LOW in points in only one less Zacha's career HIGH (And in only 40 games).
3. if Zacha does play well enough to make the Stastny signing look silly, then we have our top 3 centers as Nico, Zacha, and Stastny, which is dope as hell. That's great depth.

Saying you wouldn't sign a career 0.78 PPG CENTER for nothing but a currency we're flush with (Cap space) because our (underwhelming) young guy MIGHT be better than him or that he's a certain age, on a team where the goal this coming season will be to get back to the playoffs is just.. a very bad take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billdo

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,484
16,390
Ocean County
Doesn't help your cap. Doesn't help Zacha's icetime. He needs to get his confidence up; not be buried on a 3rd line. We've got bigger needs at RW and LD and I'm not sure Stastny is really an upgrade if Zacha progresses and takes the same strides as he did this year.

Big if with regard to the last sentence. The other points are valid with the exception of it being a cap issue. He's not going to get the type of deal people want to offer JT or Carlson. I don't think it would be hard to have him here cap wise. I also wouldn't mind giving Zacha a shot at wing. Having depth up the middle wouldn't hurt.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,538
13,922
1. We have more cap space now and in the near future than we can sensibly use.

Agreed, with emphasis on now. Soon this will not be true.

2. Assuming Zacha will be better than Stastny now or in the near future is a long shot and frankly silly. Especially since Stastny's career LOW in points in only one less Zacha's career HIGH (And in only 40 games).

This is the kind of statement that looks silly when you are comparing 20 year olds to 32 year olds. Zacha could well be better than Stastny next season. But that's not the reason not to sign Stastny.

Saying you wouldn't sign a career 0.78 PPG CENTER for nothing but a currency we're flush with (Cap space) because our (underwhelming) young guy MIGHT be better than him or that he's a certain age, on a team where the goal this coming season will be to get back to the playoffs is just.. a very bad take.

The Devils are flush with cap space now. They are not flush with future cap space. They have Hall, Hischier, Bratt, and now Anderson all needing new contracts in the same year, plus they have Zacha and Butcher requiring new contracts in the meantime, and they have large uncertainty about their future goaltending. Anything that happens in the next 2 years that just needs cap space - great, do it. Anything that extends past those 2 years could potentially cause issues, so you want to make sure you're getting the most out of your money at this point. Having a turning-35 year old center along with your 35 year old center signed for a combined $11-12M or so is not going to be the best use of cap space in 2020-21. The Devils' goal shouldn't be to make the playoffs - it should be to become a Stanley Cup contender. I like Stastny, and on some teams he would be the missing piece, but I don't think he is on this Devils team.
 

Call Me Al

Registered User
Aug 28, 2017
5,584
6,963
agreed, the devils should not be signing any large contracts unless that person is expected to be a big part of this team for the next 5+ years, i dont see any 30+ year olds fitting that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taylor Hall

None Shall Pass

Dano moisturizes
Jul 7, 2007
15,425
11,721
Brooklyn
The Devils' goal shouldn't be to make the playoffs - it should be to become a Stanley Cup contender. I like Stastny, and on some teams he would be the missing piece, but I don't think he is on this Devils team.

We need more than one missing piece - we need a top defender or two, and some depth scoring. We're going to need to add more than one piece. A high scoring center is as good an option as any. We can't expect to just be able to get all of these things at once.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadDog172430

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,441
31,781
Just stop. He got less poweplay time because he’s not good enough to play on the power play. And if he’s good, he should be helping his line mates.

Excuses, excuses, excuses.

While I'm no Zacha fan the idea of not being 'good enough' for the PP is a bunch of hogwash when they throw out guys like Brian Boyle, Jimmy Hayes and Drew Stafford on the PP. That's the kind of stuff that made me want to pack Ward's bag for him.
 

Darkauron

Registered User
Jul 14, 2011
11,665
8,017
South Jersey
While I'm no Zacha fan the idea of not being 'good enough' for the PP is a bunch of hogwash when they throw out guys like Brian Boyle, Jimmy Hayes and Drew Stafford on the PP. That's the kind of stuff that made me want to pack Ward's bag for him.

Yeah that was such a joke. Zacha could get some confidence if he was put on the RW for the PP and just told to make slapshots from that spot. Use to get so many goals from there in juniors.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,538
13,922
We need more than one missing piece - we need a top defender or two, and some depth scoring. We're going to need to add more than one piece. A high scoring center is as good an option as any. We can't expect to just be able to get all of these things at once.

He's 33 in December. Odds are by the time the Devils have assembled the other missing pieces, this one is a liability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleedred

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,538
13,922
While I'm no Zacha fan the idea of not being 'good enough' for the PP is a bunch of hogwash when they throw out guys like Brian Boyle, Jimmy Hayes and Drew Stafford on the PP. That's the kind of stuff that made me want to pack Ward's bag for him.

Power plays aren't made by just sticking 5 guys out there and telling them to score. You want to put people in roles where they will succeed, and handedness is also critical to certain things will operate on a power play. Zacha is about the last forward on the team I would put in the Brian Boyle role - I think his hands around the net are a weakness, not a strength. Stafford and Hayes got the positions they did because they shoot right-handed. Zacha does not. He's not eligible for those spots.

That said, I think the Devils took Zacha off the power play for long stretches of the season because they wanted him to focus on his even-strength play, and he will be back on the power play this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oneiro

billingtons ghost

Registered User
Nov 29, 2010
10,576
6,835
1. We have more cap space now and in the near future than we can sensibly use.
2. Assuming Zacha will be better than Stastny now or in the near future is a long shot and frankly silly. Especially since Stastny's career LOW in points in only one less Zacha's career HIGH (And in only 40 games).
3. if Zacha does play well enough to make the Stastny signing look silly, then we have our top 3 centers as Nico, Zacha, and Stastny, which is dope as hell. That's great depth.

Saying you wouldn't sign a career 0.78 PPG CENTER for nothing but a currency we're flush with (Cap space) because our (underwhelming) young guy MIGHT be better than him or that he's a certain age, on a team where the goal this coming season will be to get back to the playoffs is just.. a very bad take.

Signing a 32 year old guy who
1 has perennially underwhelmed
2 hasn't played 82 games since he was 20 except last year
3 can barely scratch 50 points on good years playing on top lines
4 expects 6-7m/aav

Is a bad take. There's never been a time when this guy has lived up to expectations and his ex-teammates can barely refrain taking pot-shots at him - especially as he jumps ship and was a locker-room cancer on an Avs team that has finally just turned it around.

His .78 ppg benefits from two fantastic years

Is *that* the kind of 32 year old vet you want to bring in to a young impressionable team? Pass.

This board ripped Henrique non-sensically for floating around - I can't imagine how much fun we'd have bringing in this guy at 1.5x the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devils Dominion

MadDevil

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2007
33,855
23,762
Bismarck, ND
Keep moving the goalposts, but we are not like a Vikings kicker

That's rich coming from a guy who constantly deflects or outright pretends that it never happened when he's proven to be wrong. Is it that hard for you to admit that you, a draft guru, could have been wrong? Or is the need for self congratulation just too strong for you?
 

Bleedred

Travis Green BLOWS! Bring back Nasreddine!
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
130,385
57,852
Stastny would be pretty sweet if it were for 2 years, maybe 3 years maximum, but I think even then, we might not like him anymore by year 3.

He's already 32 and he could be pretty bad by year 3, which during year 3 he will turn 35.
 

Oneiro

Registered User
Mar 28, 2013
9,490
11,108
I see Zacha's issue's as lack of assertiveness, I think he thinks the game pretty well. Overthinks it perhaps.

Unless we are saying a guy who over thinks or over passes or is not aggressive enough lack's hockey IQ, and I could see using the term in that way, but I feel that is not often how it is used.

I think you're right re: lack of assertiveness. He is like the Larsson of forwards in that it's been hard for the fanbase, myself included, to accept the slower development curve, but there is steady improvement along with a natural skillset that's self-evident.

Without Nico, this whole discussion is a lot more emotionally charged and way less rational (a scary thought).
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

AfroThunder396

[citation needed]
Jan 8, 2006
39,132
23,195
Miami, FL
Signing a 32 year old guy who
1 has perennially underwhelmed
2 hasn't played 82 games since he was 20 except last year
3 can barely scratch 50 points on good years playing on top lines

4 expects 6-7m/aav

Is a bad take. There's never been a time when this guy has lived up to expectations and his ex-teammates can barely refrain taking pot-shots at him - especially as he jumps ship and was a locker-room cancer on an Avs team that has finally just turned it around.

His .78 ppg benefits from two fantastic years

Is *that* the kind of 32 year old vet you want to bring in to a young impressionable team? Pass.

This board ripped Henrique non-sensically for floating around - I can't imagine how much fun we'd have bringing in this guy at 1.5x the price.
This is one point, not two. He's been on a 50 point or higher pace in every season of his career with the exception of 2015.

He has a mean PPG of 0.78 and a median PPG of 0.77. Seven of his 12 seasons are above 0.7 PPG. That's a normal distribution. It's not inflated by outlier seasons like you suggest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: None Shall Pass

None Shall Pass

Dano moisturizes
Jul 7, 2007
15,425
11,721
Brooklyn
Not even paces, either! Dude scored more than 50 points in 7 of his 11 full (non-lockout) seasons, and that's not factoring in injuries. But sure, let's go with "can barely scratch 50 points", which is just unbelievably wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkauron

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad