That makes no sense
It does
19
16
16
12
Minutes.
Teams that cycle well have to be very skilled teams. The whole idea of cycling, whether it's a low cycle or a high cycle ( which incorporates the D), is to pull defenders out of position with misdirection , wear them down and open up passing and shooting lanes. This whole possession description is kind of nonsense, all good offensive hockey involves possession and cycling is a good offensive tactic.
The Blackhawks were deadly on the cycle when they were winning Cups. Crosby might be one of the best cycle players in the game...ever, the Sedins, Jagr, the Bruins with Bergeron and Marchand, Schief and Wheels, you can go on and on.
Cycling is essential in the NHL game, especially since all the obstruction and stick infraction changes. It completely changed the cycle game and how effectively teams and players use it.
Includes overtime?In a 60 minute hockey game? I like the math
It does
19
16
16
12
Minutes.
In a 60 minute hockey game? I like the math
Thanks i was to busy to explain it further that day.I guess he means TOI-wise, and that makes a lot of sense to me.
The Jets do have material to have 2 first lines for example, or even traditional 1-2-3-4 -lines. But TOI-wise it seems that Maurice is playing 1-3-3-4 -lines instead, and I don't think that's optimal. To me the great material allows for much more even TOI we are experiencing currently. In other words: they should not play Wheeler & Scheifele as much as they do to play all situations.
In a 60 minute hockey game? I like the math
Agree, and I'd go so far as to say that Laine's weakness in this essential component of the NA game is one of the reasons that Connor is playing ahead of him on the Scheifele line.Teams that cycle well have to be very skilled teams. The whole idea of cycling, whether it's a low cycle or a high cycle ( which incorporates the D), is to pull defenders out of position with misdirection , wear them down and open up passing and shooting lanes. This whole possession description is kind of nonsense, all good offensive hockey involves possession and cycling is a good offensive tactic.
The Blackhawks were deadly on the cycle when they were winning Cups. Crosby might be one of the best cycle players in the game...ever, the Sedins, Jagr, the Bruins with Bergeron and Marchand, Schief and Wheels, you can go on and on.
Cycling is essential in the NHL game, especially since all the obstruction and stick infraction changes. It completely changed the cycle game and how effectively teams and players use it.
Agree, and I'd go so far as to say that Laine's weakness in this essential component of the NA game is one of the reasons that Connor is playing ahead of him on the Scheifele line.
Profuse apologies for implying he may have a weakness
Agree, and I'd go so far as to say that Laine's weakness in this essential component of the NA game is one of the reasons that Connor is playing ahead of him on the Scheifele line.
Profuse apologies for implying he may have a weakness
Here is an article in finnish about gaming and Laine: NHL-seura kielsi videopelit pelimatkoilla – Patrik Laineelta napakka kuitti kuumaan keskusteluun
Main points:
- Vancouver forbid bringing consoles to road trips
- Laine plays less during hockey season
- He goes to sleep 11 PM or earlier every night.
- He says hockey is is "meal ticket", not video games - so he knows which one to focus.
So there should be no fear His hobby affecting His performance.
He seems to admit the dangers and to be responsible about his gaming which is good. But he also admitted to having played 13h marathon sessions during the season... Fortunately he also says he doesn't do those if he's got a game the following day. So it seems as he indulges even during the season, but seems to keep it in check, realizes the dangers and said he's cutting down on the playtime. So I'm not worried anymore.
Incorrect. He did admit that his record was 13 hours (waking up 10am and playing until 11pm). He did not admit having 13 hour sessionS during season. One off, and during multi day rest.
I just hope this Fortnite discussion is finally put into rest after this latest article.
Or what if he said he read books when he wasn’t working out?Had he said that he likes to watch TV 8 hours a day nobody would've batted an eye.
The article says, "Laine told IS during last spring (i.e. during the season), that sometimes on days off he can spend half the day on the console." And then he goes on to talk about the 13h session that he can't have those if he's got a game the next day. I also get the impression that the 13h session was during the season, because he said he had several days off after it, and I also read as it happening last spring.
I don't think your take is correct tbh. But it doesn't really matter as long as he can keep the urges in check, and he says he does realise the dangers.
My take is correct, your take simply was not. You can read Finnish, I suppose. There is simply no chance to intrepret his words like he had multiple 13 hour sessions during last season.
Laine:
"– Kyllä mää joinain päivinä pelaan aika paljon. Parhaimpana päivänä taisi mennä 13 tuntia. Heräsin aamukymmeneltä ja pelasin iltayhteentoista asti, mutta silloin oli monta vapaapäivää peräkkäin. Ei niin, että heti peliin seuraavana päivänä."
As direct translation I was able to do:
Laine: "-Yes I do play quite a lot some days. The best day I had [regarding PS4 gaming] it was like 13 hours. I did wake up 10 am and did play until 11 pm, but there were several days off in a row. Not like that you had a [NHL] game the next day."
Also if you wake up 10 am and go to bed 11 pm, you aren't actually even playing 13 hours. You need to eat and have some bathroom breaks. But let's say he was online 13 hours in a row.