nobody important
the pessimist returns
Click "edit" on the OP
Then click "Go Advanced"
Edit the title
Done, thanks. My brain always saw those options as save, cancel, and "something that isn't important".
Click "edit" on the OP
Then click "Go Advanced"
Edit the title
Do you think Laine would've benefited more staying in liiga for another year or two?
Do you think Laine would've benefited more staying in liiga for another year or two?
I'm aware of his success
But that success has to do with how he was developing in Finland
Scheifele continued to develop is his game in the O
Ehlers took another year in the Moosehead
Trouba stayed in Michigan(?)
I'm aware of his success
But that success has to do with how he was developing in Finland
Scheifele continued to develop is his game in the O
Ehlers took another year in the Moosehead
Trouba stayed in Michigan(?)
It took Scheifele 5 seasons before he was as successful in the NHL as Laine has been this season. It's a slippery slope once you start developing every player the same way regardless of how they perform.
Patrik is an 18 year old rookie that is producing on par with league superstars. I feel like people tend to forget that first part
I'm aware of his success
But that success has to do with how he was developing in Finland
Scheifele continued to develop is his game in the O
Ehlers took another year in the Moosehead
Trouba stayed in Michigan(?)
He is having an incredible rookie season, arguably one of the best in European history as an 18 year old. He absolutely belongs in the NHL.
The past 2 games he hasn't played up to his potential, but that is very common for any rookie. He will get in the groove again once he rides another wave of confidence.
I'm not criticizing his game. He clearly has the skills to play in the NHL
He's a stop 30 scorer and a top 10 goal scorer in his rookie year at 18. Don't get much better than that
My question isn't whether he's good enough or not
But would be better for his development(?)
Obviously his trainers/coaches/teachers are what helped him to get where he is
Maybe play games with that group while he grows into a man would make him a better hockey player?
And that's why I bring up Ehlers
Scheif and Trouba
They stayed with that squad that got them there
But with Laine. It's the jets teaching him right now
Would it be better for his development if he stayed in Liiga or AHL for one more year, compared to developing right now in NHL? If that's the question, then; no, it wouldn't have been better.
He's playing top minutes in the toughest league, against top opposition. He's currently learning/developing in the environment and role for which the two lower level alternatives only prepared him for. Why on earth this would hinder his development compared to development in Liiga or AHL? On the other hand, IF he was playing only few minutes a game, in sub-optimal role, then one more year in Liiga or AHL would make any sense.
Because sometimes the student is only as good as the teacher
And the teachers in finland were doing so fine job with his development.
And it's not like he was playing in a bum league with kids
I'm not criticizing his game. He clearly has the skills to play in the NHL
He's a stop 30 scorer and a top 10 goal scorer in his rookie year at 18. Don't get much better than that
My question isn't whether he's good enough or not
But would be better for his development(?)
Obviously his trainers/coaches/teachers are what helped him to get where he is
Maybe play games with that group while he grows into a man would make him a better hockey player?
And that's why I bring up Ehlers
Scheif and Trouba
They stayed with that squad that got them there
But with Laine. It's the jets teaching him right now
I did not see Ehlers in the background. Nice. Who is pictured on top of the little guy?
I'm not criticizing his game. He clearly has the skills to play in the NHL
He's a stop 30 scorer and a top 10 goal scorer in his rookie year at 18. Don't get much better than that
My question isn't whether he's good enough or not
But would be better for his development(?)
Obviously his trainers/coaches/teachers are what helped him to get where he is
Maybe play games with that group while he grows into a man would make him a better hockey player?
And that's why I bring up Ehlers
Scheif and Trouba
They stayed with that squad that got them there
But with Laine. It's the jets teaching him right now
So here's a question: what benefits do you think would have been provided by having him play in a lower level league this year?
I honestly don't know all the history of Laine so that's why I'm asking the question in the first place
The most I know about him is thst YouTube video I saw posted on here
Of him getting ready for the NHL in finland
But my thoughts would be. While yes; it's a lower level of comp
It's still a pretty high level for a hockey player at that age
And he'd be guided by the same trainers/coaching that's gotten him to that level
I'm not criticizing his game. He clearly has the skills to play in the NHL
He's a stop 30 scorer and a top 10 goal scorer in his rookie year at 18. Don't get much better than that
My question isn't whether he's good enough or not
But would be better for his development(?)
Obviously his trainers/coaches/teachers are what helped him to get where he is
Maybe play games with that group while he grows into a man would make him a better hockey player?
And that's why I bring up Ehlers
Scheif and Trouba
They stayed with that squad that got them there
But with Laine. It's the jets teaching him right now