Insomniac99
Registered User
From what my Criminal Law professor told me, if you CHOOSE to get drunk, it all goes out the window. You can't say "Oh, I was drunk, I couldn't consent" if you chose to get drunk.
And yet it happens all the time
From what my Criminal Law professor told me, if you CHOOSE to get drunk, it all goes out the window. You can't say "Oh, I was drunk, I couldn't consent" if you chose to get drunk.
In the cup parade, didn't Kane say something along the lines of, "look out for me this summer"?
At the time I thought he was making fun of himself for his immaturity in his younger years. Now it looks like he is an immature ****.
very vague title
From what my Criminal Law professor told me, if you CHOOSE to get drunk, it all goes out the window. You can't say "Oh, I was drunk, I couldn't consent" if you chose to get drunk.
From what my Criminal Law professor told me, if you CHOOSE to get drunk, it all goes out the window. You can't say "Oh, I was drunk, I couldn't consent" if you chose to get drunk.
From what my Criminal Law professor told me, if you CHOOSE to get drunk, it all goes out the window. You can't say "Oh, I was drunk, I couldn't consent" if you chose to get drunk.
The amendment hasn't been challenged yet. There has yet to be another case similar to Daviault. In fact, the laws on automatism and temporary insanity have actually been expanded since this case came down.
you're criminal law professor shouldn't be a criminal law professor
That would only be if you gave "drunken consent" though, correct? If passed out this would not apply, one would hope.
That would only be if you gave "drunken consent" though, correct? If passed out this would not apply, one would hope.
I don't understand what you're saying here. Claiming that the accusations are false because she just wants to get his money, or the general dismissal of the situation is rape apologizing.
Without an actual confession, I don't know how they could prove a complete made up story.
The simple fact of you being drunk doesn't mean a crime was committed against you tho simply because you feel you would't have made the choice to have sex had you been sober.
That is what he is saying.
I think you are missing the one key thing that actually makes this argument work which is the consenting to something while drunk isn't always considered consenting. He isn't saying that he/she is too drunk to even talk because then it is quite obvious what the answer is but the message to a lot of high school and college students now a days is that you can't consent while being drunk.
Any evidence of the bolded? IMO the wrong decision was made at the point of not having another way home (or bringing your car) before you started drinking. Again, you seem to be missing the point that consent is an essential element of the thing in Q in some cases (e.g., contracts, consensual sex) but not in other cases (e.g., drunk driving, theft).
I won't post about this again bc it's OT IMO.