Player Discussion Par Lindholm
- Thread starter Dr Hook
- Start date
BruinDust
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 24,365
- 21,809
Over the top andbeing this guy. Not good.
What exactly is over the top about it? As a Bruins fan I am quite pleased we will never see Par Lindholm in a Bruins uniform again. I always said he wasn't an NHL caliber player and now we have proof as he's no longer in the NHL.
Saxon Eric
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2005
- 20,285
- 27,342
Good spare part that usually did his job, I had no problem with him
I am rather excited having an extra roster spot though,College free agency is coming!
I am rather excited having an extra roster spot though,College free agency is coming!
I think they took a flyer hoping he had a little more offense to give since he was pretty productive his last couple years in Sweden. Didn't work out that way, but for $850k for a veteran on a short deal, he was fine.
I am guessing they would have liked to keep him for insurance, but did the right thing in letting him go to have a nice career in Europe.
A decent vet who provided very little good to the team BUT did no harm at all while on the ice
PatriceBergeronFan
Registered User
Bumper
Registered User
ODAAT
Registered User
did pretty much what he was signed on to do, be a 13/14th forward, step in when injuries occurred and play sound defensive minded hockey. Did his job well. While I won`t pretend he was a great signing, it`s not as though his cap hit hurt the B`s and it allowed them to put a responsible defensive forward in rather than have to call up kids from the A
Lobster57
Registered User
He was a 12-14th forward kind of guy. He was signed and paid to fill that role. If we could score more, he'd be a 3rd liner and would cost more. It's the same thing with Kuraly and Wagner. They're fourth liners, they put up 4th line numbers. If they were more consistent offensively they'd be playing on Ottawa or Detroit's third line.
