Panarin-Anisimov-Kane best line in NHL?

[Kanneda]

A line with Anisimov as it's center can't be the best in the league.
Not saying he's bad, but center is the most important position and he's nowhere near the bests.

 

[Mrb1p]

A line with Anisimov as it's center can't be the best in the league.
Not saying he's bad, but center is the most important position and he's nowhere near the bests.

Agreed. Even with Kane.

 

[Bear12Good]

I think Anisimov very underrated player

 

[buttman*]

It's almost as good as

Who cares -- McDavid -- Speed bag

 

[Skobel24]

I think Anisimov very underrated player

He's a solid two way center, but I still see him as a #2/3 center. He's the weak link on that line. They have chemistry though, so there's no sense in breaking them up.

 

[2 Minute Minor]

They were last year. It remains to be seen if they're the best this year. I think Benn's line in Dallas may have something to say about it.

 

[Ezekial]

I think Anisimov very underrated player

Alert the internet, Russian thinks Russian is underrated.

He is what he is, he's slotted above his ability but he compliments those two players well.

They are a great line for sure, where was this thread after the first 3 games though? Btw I love Kane and Panarin.

 

[excape]

A line with Anisimov as it's center can't be the best in the league.
Not saying he's bad, but center is the most important position and he's nowhere near the bests.

Not necessarily true. The WCE line was (arguably) the best line in hockey at the time, and they had Morrison at center.

 

[Purity*]

I think Anisimov very underrated player

He's actually a really good center for that line. All skill lines need a grunt-work puck retriever.

 

[Willy Stylez]

Not the best overall, but offensively probably. Joy to watch Kaner and Panarin.

 

[Arcade Fire]

I remember there was a similar thread last year where somebody called those players bread, peanut butter, and jelly

 

[LaP]

Did you mean Panarin and Kane the best duo? Cause i'm sure you could replace Anisimov by lot of players and get the same result or even a better one in many case.

 

[TheBigThree]

hyman - matthews - nylander

 

[Juxtaposer]

Hertl-Thornton-Pavelski
Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak
Whoever-McDavid-Whoever
Whoever-Crosby-Whoever

Are all lines I'd take over Panarin-Anisimov-Kane.

 

[Lehkonen4Calder]

Toews with 1 point in 4 games. That contract is looking awfull right now

 

[NeedleInTheHay]

Who cares - Crosby - Hornqvist

 

[Fazkovsky]

Is anisimov a legit 1st line c in the NHL ?

 

[Bending and Tending]

It's almost as good as

Who cares -- McDavid -- Speed bag

It'll be interesting to see how they stack up against

Trash can -- Crosby -- My left nut

 

[Bear12Good]

Hertl-Thornton-Pavelski
Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak
Whoever-McDavid-Whoever
Whoever-Crosby-Whoever

Are all lines I'd take over Panarin-Anisimov-Kane.

Hmmmm

S.Thornton-Crosby-Neil better Panarin-Anisimov-Kane?

 

[vadim sharifijanov]

ha to all of us who picked up panik from the FA pile in our hockey pools

 

[Riddum]

Alert the internet, Russian thinks Russian is underrated.

He is what he is, he's slotted above his ability but he compliments those two players well.

They are a great line for sure, where was this thread after the first 3 games though? Btw I love Kane and Panarin.

They weren't together at the time.

 

[Ezekial]

They weren't together at the time.

They've been together for a majority of this season, ~77% of their es shifts through the first four games.

 

[Riddum]

They've been together for a majority of this season, ~77% of their es shifts through the first four games.

Was the OP supposed to make the thread after 1 game? Everyone agrees that they were the most dynamic line last season. They have the best Russian player [in Panarin]. The Best offensive force in the league going on 3 seasons, in Kane and a solid complement who has talent.

The OP has a legitimate question.

 

[stuffradio]

Sedin - Sedin - Eriksson...

 

[Aestivalis]

A 1-game outburst isn't really worth this amount of hype. Especially when you consider that Provorov was -5 for the night (and two of Chicago's goals were on the man-advantage); that big hole in the Flyers defense was pretty obvious.