We’re only on your lawn because we can afford a house with a lawn of its own.All these college kids with their liberal arts degrees and safe spaces.
Get off my lawn
We’re only on your lawn because we can afford a house with a lawn of its own.All these college kids with their liberal arts degrees and safe spaces.
Get off my lawn
Yep, there's some degrees that aren't worth wiping your ass with at this point. The 3 months it took to get my certification in Epic to be an overglorified IT guy is worth a hell of a lot more now than my 4 years studying music.
Yup, best advice I could give isA lot of college degrees are junk, and you end up 50+K in debt. I tell every young kid to go to vocational school and get a certificate in welding or some other trade. Come out of it making 20+ an hour and little debt.
i like learning
i am teaching myself how to code in my spare time so i can automate even more of my job. eventually they will replace me with a machine that i have coded. what a fool, i am
i like learning
i am teaching myself how to code in my spare time so i can automate even more of my job. eventually they will replace me with a machine that i have coded. what a fool, i am
Nah. If you're irreplaceable, you're unpromotable.
A lot of college degrees are junk, and you end up 50+K in debt. I tell every young kid to go to vocational school and get a certificate in welding or some other trade. Come out of it making 20+ an hour and little debt.
Lol, that article isn't slanted at all. It's ironic how the article decries the irresponsibility and the lack of restraint shown by the Jerusalem Post in reporting an article where no "verifiable data" is available, yet the mainstream media demonstrates the same tendencies when given the opportunity to attack the president.
read the article then tell me if the points made are consistent with the current practices exhibited by the media.
Lol, that article isn't slanted at all. It's ironic how the article decries the irresponsibility and the lack of restraint shown by the Jerusalem Post in reporting an article where no "verifiable data" is available, yet the mainstream media demonstrates the same tendencies when given the opportunity to attack the president.
Wtf are you even talking about?
Catchwords "hope trumps history", "far right", "Pro Trump twitter troll", "Fox's grabby headline" (while commending the also initially reporting non-conservative NYP and Forbes for their "new, decidedly less rosy" stories posted within 24 hours) will probably trigger a conservative-minded reader to think that the article is much more about politically motivated decrying of the (specifically conservative) social media scene than "science" to which the article is nominally categorized.Wtf are you even talking about?
Was that the main point though, or was the actual main point that the "far right" segment of social media and "grabby headline" Fox News started pumping it up what with being the fake news pedlars they are, whilst giving a pass to the non-nefarious NYP and Forbes, the whole presented using loaded vocabulary that gives the left-wing social media fuel to regurgitate on all the wrong that right-wing social media does.the article is written terribly, but the main point that this "cure" is complete bunk science is accurate