Yeah, 2pts is always good, but I'm scared.
First period temp was sweet, and the first goal was good. But after that...
The second goal from the 3rd line turned out to be rather flukey (two close-quarter deflections, the goal in off a belly?), so nuttin' to really say the trio was or can click. Add on that they had an artificially higher ozone start %, were often doing more chasing than hunting, at least twice got stuck in their dzone for scarey stretches, accounted for only 3 shots (0/Jarnrork,1/Hodgson,2Arvidsson), and did all of that nuttin' with the meager ~10mins of ES ice time they were trusted with and... Well, I'm not even cautiously optimistic.
Then there was the 2nd line which appeared more dominant, sure, but also got trapped in their zone too much, Fisher's faceoff% actually worse than Hodgson's, and their combined corsi differential at ES actually a slug -1 worse than the 3rd line's too? AND this trio has actually played together before? They're the 2nd PP unit?
Which brings me to the PP... I mean, it wasn't bad, generated chances, sure, but I'm not referring to that last PP in the 3rd where they might have tried to close the deal and couldn't even seem to set up. Scary.
Also, I genuinely hope tonight wasn't an indicator of what to expect from Fisher (25%) and Riberio (21%) in the face-off area? When both a team's 1c & 2c lead the way in being *that* ugly in the dot... Well, just ouch.
All in, I really really liked my intro game to -
- the 1st line (lottsa pace, clicking, moves, generating chances, puck stealing, etc.)
- Fisher's physical game (if he didn't lead in hits then I've really missed something, sure seemed like he was everywhere in the ozone)
- Rinne's calm solid style (well, except when he scared me with all that puck handling - is that normal?)
- a whole solid d corps in general, but maybe especially Jones and Weber.
- the energy and soundness of the 4th line which really seemed to know and to do its job
Otherwise though, I'm scared. Really scared.