PeterSidorkiewicz
HFWF Tourney Undisputed Champion
i found the women's gold medal game was more entertaining than both Men's semis and finals.
Me too. 2010 was also awesome. This year's, meh.
i found the women's gold medal game was more entertaining than both Men's semis and finals.
i found the women's gold medal game was more entertaining than both Men's semis and finals.
I personally find women's hockey horrendous. Lots of flubbing passes turnovers and general sloppiness. They are probably better hockey players than I could ever hope to be, but I still don't think its anywhere close to the men's tourney.
This team just seemed to get a little better every game. I shudder to think how good they would be if they played for another two weeks.
As far as I'm concerned Drew Doughty and Shea Weber are the two best defensemen on the planet AINEC.
Did not enjoy Olympic hockey at all. Very very boring.
In the context of the Olympics only, I probably enjoy curling more than hockey.
Mostly because there's something about Olympic curling that is much more intense and fun to watch than Olympic hockey for some reason.
In the context of the Olympics only, I probably enjoy curling more than hockey.
Mostly because there's something about Olympic curling that is much more intense and fun to watch than Olympic hockey for some reason.
If you find curling more intense than hockey......I don't even know.
BREAKING NEWS: DIFFERENT PEOPLE LIKE DIFFERENT THINGS
We'll have this, and more breaking stories, coming up tonight, on News At Eleven.
Have you watched curling before?
I've been curling possibly for longer than you have been alive (30 years).
I was a provincial level (Ontario) Juniors player.
... yes. I have watched curling before.
It's not an intense hobby.
Also, I've been alive longer than you've been throwing rocks around, son. :p
Have you played? Been in a competitive spiel? Provincial playdowns? A game with something on the line? Played against guys like John Morris?
It can be very intense.
Meh, based on the average age of posters on these boards, you can't blame me for playing the odds on that one. I had like an 80% chance of being right.
I'm sure curling is intense for the people participating/competing. But it's about as intense as pool or bowling for a non-curling audience. Still don't get how it's an Olympic sport.
And yeah, us old farts are quite the endangered species 'round these parts. I'd have guessed you were younger as well.
Did not enjoy Olympic hockey at all. Very very boring.
NMF for commish!Same.
It was excellent hockey from a technical standpoint. Strong defense and few mistakes. It felt like pretty much every team in the Olympics was playing a boring, safe, trap system. Sure, it's better odds for teams trying to win, but difficult to watch.
But it's the mistakes and the intimacy of the smaller North American ice which makes the game more entertaining. That's one of the reasons why the 1980s was so much fun...some really great teams and some horrible ones, along with so-so goaltending. Lots of skating with the skill teams, lots of scrambling in the defensive zone, etc.
If we could combine the 80s style play with the (massively improved) individual skill level of today's players along with getting rid of all the interference and pick plays, and normals sized (1980s) goalie equipment, I'd be in heaven. And get rid of the stupid trap system.
Best way to do it, imo, 3 points for regulation win, 2 points for an OT win, 1 point for a OT loss. First tie breaker in standings would be Goals For. Force teams to try and push for more goals.
If you find curling more intense than hockey......I don't even know.
Other sports would be great if they were Hockey!