My point is hockey Canada can build a team SO Much then everyone else, it doesn't matter.
They aren't winning a Stanley Cup in the NHL playoff (which the still would anyway without those guys), it's single games.
They have a Larger Talent pool then any other nation at every position (except goal, it's Price, Holtby and then a drop off), so this BS about 200ft game and defensive shut down you guys, is stupid.
This team can be build with pure offensive players and would destroy everyone because you literally couldn't keep up with them.
The other thing, that everyone forgets, that defensecore is SO good 200ft players are fairly moot.
It's not 1987 anymore. The world has narrowed the gap, and they play a trap/counter-attack style against Canada. Run-and-gun plays right into what the weaker nations want in a game against Canada. To win Hockey Canada has to send their best players, who play the system the coach wants to implement, and who have proven they can elevate their play in big games. Moreover, as I have stated numerous times, Canada needs to consider all game situations - they need 6 elite defensive forwards to play the PK (unless you think they will never take a penalty). Canada needs at least four dominant faceoff takers (two-righties and two lefties). We need players that can play any forward position so that lines can be shuffled as needed when the opponent deploys different tactics.
Do I think Hall should make the 2016 WC team? Yes, I think he has a good chance to be one of the remaining players named, especially as natural wingers are relatively the weakest position for Canada.
Should Hall be a lock for Team Canada first 16 players named? No, because he doesn't have the resume these others player have.
If you think Seguin and Stamkos are 200 ft players...
Seguin makes it because of chemistry with Benn, who was a lock for the team, and they are 2/3 in league scoring. Simple as that. If Hall was in Dallas, and had chemistry with Benn, he would be in Seguin's place.
Stamkos was a controversial choice for the original 16, IMO, because his play has fallen off a bit in recent years (i.e., he is no longer a guy that threatens to score 50 goals every season). That being said, I think Hockey Canada is committed to playing him in Crosby's wing. The only major value I see Stamkos adding a big one-timer on the PP. Outside of Weber, Canada lacked a heavy shot on the PP in 2014. That is why some feel Subban should also be on the team; however, RHD is a crowded position for Canada.
Stamkos is a "bigger" name regardless of his performance. It's the same reason Rick Nash always gets considered.
Hall and Giroux can be 1 and 2 in scoring and they would still be after thoughts. HC obviously has their faves. Like someone else and myself mentioned, we're probably going to see Rick Nash part of the final roster as well.
Rick Nash is silly argument. He wasn't named to the team, like many other of the double gold veterans, and yet people throw his name out there for some unknown reason. He deserved his spot in 2010 and 2014 because in his prime, he was big and he could skate. He was key to the roster as part of the Toews line in 2010 (he was lined up against prime Ovechkin in 2010 and shut him out), and his role declined to the 4th line/13th forward in 2014. He is probably not going to make the cut in 2016.