No, it's cheap for a guy you KNOW can challenge your starter.Nevermind, time to throw our hands up in sadness and empathy? Is that what we're doing.
Yeah, that's Cheap for a guy who you think can challenge your starter.
Bob just said Alvis Kalnins tweet is incorrect, wouldn’t say which part.
Judging by this twelve second highlight reel(that clearly doesn't focus on highlight reel plays over typical goaltending), I've determined that he obviously has terrible technique and that's he's clearly being carried by a team I know nothing about in a league that I know even less about.
Top notch analysis as usual, HFboards.
Regardless, I'm not making any judgements overall, just pointing out that the falling tree stye of goaltending exhibited in that single clip is a particularly reliable one.
Jason Gregor (on Lowetide's show today) and Stauffer saying the terms aren't correct.
Gregor says he believe's the contract is actually 2 years x 1.25m per year or 1 year x $2.5 m per year
Can the pitchforks be put away?
FWIW I remember @GameChanger speaking highly of this goalie's technique/potential. I'm a fan of picking talent out of Europe, especially goalies. I see Tim Thomas mentioned - well, if he comes over and has a few seasons for us like Thomas did for the Bruins, that's clearly a win.
Too expensive.
Not shocking from our pathetic GM.
I've spoken mainly about Veini Vehviläinen, a much younger guy. He's very solid technically and I'm surprised if he won't make a nice career in NA.
I haven't followed Koskinen as closely, but I do feel he's a very interesting goalie. Could very well be readier to shine in the NHL than any other goalie outside of NA. Has been great in the national team and really looked like he should get a shot in the NHL.
The reason why I leave some percentage to failure is because he's such a huge guy and thus it's harder to compare him with other goalies. There's always a chance there'll be too much room between the legs or something like that, but AFAIK that hasn't been a problem in the KHL or natioanal team. Other than that he covers the goal very well and his long reach is a great asset, his head is also great and should help a lot.
All in all I wouldn't be surprised if Koskinen becomes a great #1 goalie, but of course the opposite is possible, too, although not very likely imo.
So you state that video evidence isnt enough to make a judgment but 1 single clip is somehow reliable?
You dont see a glaring contradiction with that statement?
That's more like it, if true.Jason Gregor (on Lowetide's show today) and Stauffer saying the terms aren't correct.
Gregor says he believe's the contract is actually 2 years x 1.25m per year or 1 year x $2.5 m per year
That would be great but you have to admit that it's a risk for a team to invest $5M into a career KHL goalie. It could work out but again, Chia is betting on a hope and a prayer.
Haven't you seen how salaries for players are rising since 2006? It used to be 7 million for top players etc. Now its around 9-12 million for players around that level. Of course its going to be 2.5. Were you expecting an entry level deal? Get real. This sounds like you just trying to get at Chiarelli because you hate him.
That would be great but you have to admit that it's a risk for a team to invest $5M into a career KHL goalie. It could work out but again, Chia is betting on a hope and a prayer.
I'd love it if this thread gets bumped a year from now and makes me and other naysayers look like fools but for now, I'm skeptical.
Hopefully the rumor is bogus and the numbers he signs for are more modest, something like 2.5 total over 2 years.
What is a career KHL goaltender? Koskinen has for years had the chance to be a back-up in the NHL yet he chose to be one of the biggest paid goalies in Eurasia after being acquired by the wealthiest team on the continent. Now he is coming over to play, not to sit behind someone with Talbot's resume. Of course he doesn't want to come over into the NHL as two time KHL champion and world championship silver medallist to open the hatch and make less money in a far smaller role only to relieve some organization out of their salary cap troubles.
I do not understand the need to compare Koskinen to smaller goaltenders career trajectories since I would assume every scouting team in the NHL already takes the slower development speed these giants usually have in order to get used to their bodies. Rinne was never anything but a back-up in Finland for example when starting his professional career. Why is it necessary to lie of Shestjorkin who has done nothing (not even played beyond couple games!) in the KHL play-offs while Koskinen has been clearly leading SKA's every play-off charge. Of course teams in Europe have the mind to rest goaltenders, especially in an Olympic year, for the play-offs during regular season but the pecking order could have not been much clearer between these two.
Haven't you seen how salaries for players are rising since 2006? It used to be 7 million for top players etc. Now its around 9-12 million for players around that level. Of course its going to be 2.5. Were you expecting an entry level deal? Get real. This sounds like you just trying to get at Chiarelli because you hate him.
Really?
Jason Gregor (on Lowetide's show today) and Stauffer saying the terms aren't correct.
Gregor says he believe's the contract is actually 2 years x 1.25m per year or 1 year x $2.5 m per year
Ah, damn. My bad for mixing them up, but thanks for the scouting report. I trust what you have to say about these goalies way more than all our resident highlight watchers (myself included).