missinthejets
Registered User
- Dec 24, 2005
- 4,734
- 618
What I mean is that changing coaches will not solve the issue in isolation. Eakins has not impressed, but under different circumstances he may have done better.
but this completely ignores the progress that had been made with the previous two coaches. It's not about thinking a new coach would make the team a top teir team and it never has been, it's about seeing Eakins come in and make players worse than they were and lose more games in uglier fashion than they had been losing with the previous coaches. The roster isn't perfect and no one is pretending it is, but the coach is not getting nearly as much out of them as he should be able to so why in gods name should the guy not be the first one out of town? The only way he's not the first one to go is if you decide that you want to turf the GM who bungled the coaching position so spectacularly first. Eakins has to go though, he is a terrible coach. He might have had more success if he walked into a turn key operation with a really good solid veteran roster but that was never going to be the situation in Edmonton.