Well heres my response. Pouliot is a career vet 4th NHL pick that was highly regarded in the draft that has NEVER scored 20 goals even while repeatedly being gifted topsix minutes by teams eager to try to kickstart his talent.
Pouliot, unlike Yak, is past his prime and has had 10 seasons to try to find his topsix game.
The irony being people on the board saying Yak is a bust, several of those posts going on and a dedicated thread. But you choose to call out one comment about Pouliot.
It hasn't been since his days with the Wild that he was gifted topsix minutes so he's earned in his role on the multiple teams he's played on since then. Sure you can call Pouliot a bust relative to his draft position but I'll give him credit for carving out a path and finding a role that has been useful on contending teams. Yakupov might need to take note as he could being going down a similar path but it's too soon for me to take that stance on that.
When it comes to the forum members writing Yak off as a bust when he won't be playing with McDavid, I'm with you but I chose to not engage with them as it's not even worth the discussion. I see you as someone who can actually add interesting analysis and perspective but I will always take issue when it comes to your hypocrisy on players you like and don't like. Like your issues with RNH, which I agree with, but refused to criticize Gagner for similar issues. Or going after Ference for his character when he was signed but then applauding the acquisition of Kassian.
When are you going to start holding yourself accountable on positions you take for some players you like but not others? Or is going against the common opinion your shtick?