Friedman: Oilers interested in Coyotes' Nick Bjugstad

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
36,121
16,579
It makes some sense.

They need a right shot center for the bottom six. Too much is riding on Ryan taking that role right now, and he continually seems suited for the wing. This could be a factor in why the Oilers have been going 11-7.

So I don't think we really need a physical center, just one that can play well and take a bunch of faceoffs. It seems like Bjugstad is a good choice for that.
 

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,550
46,595
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
Sure, but I presume BA would rather get a 3rd for Bjugstad over a player like Puljujarvi the team won’t give a QO to.
Probably. I thought it would be fun to put Puljujarvi with Maccelli and see if anything clicks.

Arizona has three 3rds already this summer. And four of them in ‘24.
 

Paralyzer008

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
15,260
5,298
I shouldn’t be as baffled by fan reactions in this thread as I am; after all, GMJR made the exact same mistakes when acquiring Bjugstad from Florida.

-He does not play a playoff brand of hockey.
-He is not good defensively.
-On real hockey teams that aren’t the Coyotes, he doesn’t chip in offensively.

He is 6’6”. That is all. Stop applying attributes to him that you would normally expect from a 6’6” player. He is none of those things.

It's basically this and his PK rates are among the league's worst, partly because he's never actually played that much PK before. Surprised to see so many "good PKer" comments when he's a regular on a 27th ranked PK and he's not even winning more than 50% of his faceoffs. 46%

This is a classic 104 PDO Oilers target that will amount to nothing in the playoffs.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,364
12,735
South Mountain
Probably. I thought it would be fun to put Puljujarvi with Maccelli and see if anything clicks.

Arizona has three 3rds already this summer. And four of them in ‘24.

I don’t think any team will give up an asset for Puljujarvi this season. If Edmonton needs to open up cap space I could see a team taking Puljujarvi for free or sending back a AHL contract in return.

If you want to combine Bjustad and Puljujarvi together in a deal, perhaps:

Puljujarvi + 4th or 5th from Edmonton for Bjugstad?
 

SwedishFire

Registered User
Mar 3, 2011
5,332
1,863
15 pts from one and 12 from the other isn't good scoring numbers.
Then you have to see wich icetime they got. And whos playing with Shore, Fogele, Pulju and Yamamoto who sinks offense.
Fogele has bren Ok in my book.
Kostin, McLeod, Nuge (yes), JärnmRk, Ryan, Holloway is good depth scoring.
 

SwedishFire

Registered User
Mar 3, 2011
5,332
1,863
Kinda makes sense no? The Oilers need better depth forwards and ideally a 4/5 Dman to log some defensive duties no?
Is Bjugstad a better forward than what Oilers got?

There are some players that sinks the offense. Foegele, Jesse, Yamamoto. Everyone who plays with them goes down in offensive categories. And those where highly thought of.

Ryan has the skill, but is not the best skater.
McLeod is our best depth player,
Kostin can score - our best depth goalscorer,
Holloway is on his way but still a bit unefficient- ,
Foegele isnt a scorer - he is a grinder,
Janmark as well -he can score a bit better than Fogele, but far from a sniper mentality, doesnt have that sense of where to shoot,
Jesse is Jesse, Yamamoto is bad at finnish as Jesse.

When Nuge and Kostin makes that important 3rd line, they miss a top6 piece, but I guess Ryan can fill that spot as long.
And with 7D, they reduce the offensive damage that 12th forward influences on the others.

Yes, maybe they should trade away not only Jesse, but Fogele for Bjugstad as well...
But I cant see a line of like Janmark Bjugstad Kostin be that great. (To slide in Nuge with McDavid and Hyman)
 

Captain97

Registered User
Jan 31, 2017
7,637
7,213
Toronto, Ontario
Is Bjugstad a better forward than what Oilers got?

There are some players that sinks the offense. Foegele, Jesse, Yamamoto. Everyone who plays with them goes down in offensive categories. And those where highly thought of.

Ryan has the skill, but is not the best skater.
McLeod is our best depth player,
Kostin can score - our best depth goalscorer,
Holloway is on his way but still a bit unefficient- ,
Foegele isnt a scorer - he is a grinder,
Janmark as well -he can score a bit better than Fogele, but far from a sniper mentality, doesnt have that sense of where to shoot,
Jesse is Jesse, Yamamoto is bad at finnish as Jesse.

When Nuge and Kostin makes that important 3rd line, they miss a top6 piece, but I guess Ryan can fill that spot as long.
And with 7D, they reduce the offensive damage that 12th forward influences on the others.

Yes, maybe they should trade away not only Jesse, but Fogele for Bjugstad as well...
But I cant see a line of like Janmark Bjugstad Kostin be that great. (To slide in Nuge with McDavid and Hyman)

Y'all are the experts on your team needs. Im not sure if Bjugstad is an ideal target more so I was thinking he'd be cheap and would allow the Oilers to go after a bigger fish on Defence like Gavrikov or Chychrun.
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
16,966
6,603
Halifax
The point is, that other teams secondary guys have a lot more pts than the Oilers secondary guys. Where did I say that RNH, Kane or Hyman weren't top 6 guys? I said the guys that don't play with the top 2 don't put up pts. RNH, Hyman and Kane all play with the top 2 and I never said anywhere they weren't top 6. I was very clearly talking about the rest of the roster which is bare bones offensively. Adding a Bjugstad doesn't help them score more, and in the playoffs it is very tough to win with so little depth scoring.
You said the Oilers only have 3 and lack depth IN THEIR TOP 6
 

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,550
46,595
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
Friedman just said on 32T Pod that he believes Bjugstad to Edmonton talks may be “advanced” in nature and could also involve Shayne Gostisbehere.

What could AZ get for Bjugstad and Gostisbehere (with 50% retention)?
 

Mr Kot

Registered User
Jan 15, 2022
4,736
10,185
The Oilers have also talked to Arizona about Ghost who is out for the next 4-5 weeks.



oof I hope this isn't Holland not able to make strides on other defence and settling. Not to say that ghost wouldnt help, just that not the one we should target.
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
15,936
10,480
You said the Oilers only have 3 and lack depth IN THEIR TOP 6

Nowhere did I say either. I said, don't they have enough bottome 9 guys? And I also said, the players that don't play with the Leon and Connor have 15-18 pts as the highest. Also notice that being a bottom 9 can also mean you can be top 9 as well which includes top 6.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,090
19,786
MN
Bjugstad is very tall, but I hope EDM fans aren’t expecting toughness from him. He has a big body, but there is absolutely no fight to him.

Best to think of him as mostly ineffective skill player with a long reach, and the smarts of a veteran. In other words, he probably won’t get you beat by making dumb mistakes, and might chip in the odd goal depending on how the puck bounces, but is otherwise, at best, a 3rd liner,and that’s pushing it.
 

Cup or Bust

Registered User
Oct 17, 2017
3,894
3,242
He wouldn't be a bad depth player for the bottom 6. They are still lacking there.
 

SeanMoneyHands

Registered User
Apr 18, 2019
13,231
11,259
Sounds to me like the Oilers want to stack their top 2 lines and put RNH back on McDavids wing. Getting Nick would allow them to do this without having to play bums like Pulvarvi in their top 6.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,364
12,735
South Mountain
Friedman just said on 32T Pod that he believes Bjugstad to Edmonton talks may be “advanced” in nature and could also involve Shayne Gostisbehere.

What could AZ get for Bjugstad and Gostisbehere (with 50% retention)?

Savoie + 2nd?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad