Are you logically impaired? You're initial argument was we have to move Yandle if we get Krug. We don't HAVE to move him. He already played third pairing this year and as a PP specialist.
Wow, insulting man. (First time from a Panthers fan)
No need to continue this conversation, especially given that the entire board agrees with me except for you: Krug in implies Yandle out if we're optimizing. You seem to be taking the literal "can we fit him on the books;" the answer is yes. Yet, the question we all ask is "Does it make sense for the team to keep both if we want to compete." (Or the more reasonable, "conditional on the move, what else must happen for the move to be reasonable/logical")
Edit: Really it is unnecessary to insult someone else here, especially given the circumstances. If you find someone else's view unreasonable, try to explain the differences in their reasoning and logic (which I did above).