Proposal: Nyr-edm

Unknownbutfamous

Registered User
Apr 11, 2004
457
0
NYR:
RNH
Letestu

EDM:
Buchnevich
Girardi (50% retained so 2.75 cap hit)
1st round pick
2nd round pick


Rangers get Nugent-Hopkins. 1st line center. Letestu would be our 4th line center. Would then have to move Brassard in a trade (which shouldn't be difficult as he put up low tier 1st line numbers the past two years and his contract is reasonable)

Edm get a top blue chip RW in Buchnevich. They get a much needed RHD in Girardi. Girardi cant be a 1st pairing dman anymore, but your kidding yourself if he cant slot below Larsson and be a solid rock. Oilers can use the picks to upgrade their team even more.
 

LTIR

Registered User
Nov 8, 2013
26,523
13,642
Does nothing for Edmonton .. maybe look at team needs before proposing the next time
 

LordNeverLose

Registered User
Jul 2, 2015
6,509
3,776
Picking a fight
NYR:
RNH
Letestu

EDM:
Buchnevich
Girardi (50% retained so 2.75 cap hit)
1st round pick
2nd round pick


Rangers get Nugent-Hopkins. 1st line center. Letestu would be our 4th line center. Would then have to move Brassard in a trade (which shouldn't be difficult as he put up low tier 1st line numbers the past two years and his contract is reasonable)

Edm get a top blue chip RW in Buchnevich. They get a much needed RHD in Girardi. Girardi cant be a 1st pairing dman anymore, but your kidding yourself if he cant slot below Larsson and be a solid rock. Oilers can use the picks to upgrade their team even more.

No, Girardi might literally be the worst defenseman in the NHL, and the last thing EDM wants, needs, or has any use for is more picks or undersized forward prospects.
 

belair

Balls On The Crest
Apr 9, 2010
38,755
22,038
Canada
McDavid Draisaitl Lander

That's the Oilers center depth after they pay to help NY get rid of Girardi's heinous contract.
 

Oscar Lindberg

Registered User
Dec 14, 2015
15,743
14,672
CA
Explain how this is terrible for NYR, they lose a bad dman and big deal prospects and picks EDM doesn't need

The Rangers are giving up their top prospect, picks they can't afford to trade and a garbage defenseman, for a guy they don't need in RNH and Letestu.

The Rangers have tremendous center depth, them trading for RNH is non sensical and unnecessary. Plus they lose a potential 1st line player, and picks, hence, it is a bad deal for them

Either way Girardi will be gone next summer, so trading priceless assets just to move him is also dumb
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FightingIrish17

Registered User
Jun 13, 2013
1,014
132
So the Oilers are trading a fringe 1st line centre and their 4th line centre for a bad defenceman on a brutal contract, a good winger prospect, and 2 picks they don't need?

Doesn't fill any of their needs and is atrocious value wise.
 

DraberlyakMcHallkins*

Guest
we realize Girardi has 100% negative value, right? and it just took CHI trading Teravainen to deal 1 year of Bickell?
 

HawkeyTalkMan

Registered User
Jun 23, 2015
6,271
3,445
RNH is a bottom tier 1C, but still a capable 1C (although not one you will win a championship as having your 1C IMO)

that being said, the return here for a 55+ pt center is just god awful

Buchnevich who hasnt played a lick of North American ice hockey on the smaller rink so while a good prospect, hasnt panned out to anything just yet

Arguably the worst dman in the NHL due to the salary cap in Dan Girardi

and likely bottom half 1st and 2nd round picks, which EDM has never been hurting for picks

EDM is 10000000x better off holding on to RNH and waiting for someone to offer Dumba, Spurgeon, or another dman of the like that they could better use
 

48g90a138pts

Registered User
Jun 30, 2016
10,410
5,819
Oilers RW depth atm is:

Eberle
Yakupov
Puljujarvi
Kassian
Pakarinen
Russel Patrick
Kyle Platzer
Tyler Pitlick
Taylor Beck

not too sure if we need another RW at this time.
 
Last edited:

Slatsmsg

Registered User
Jul 14, 2011
694
0
Airdrie
i fail to see how this helps the Oilers in any way next season ... After 10 years out of the playoffs that would all but guarantee another top 3-4 pick next year ... This in no way addresses Edmontons needs
 

RangerGuru

Registered User
May 14, 2013
1,189
6
Rangers pass. No need for another C or to deal away our top prospect and another 1st when those are the type of assets the team should be collecting at the moment
 

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
NYR:
RNH
Letestu

EDM:
Buchnevich
Girardi (50% retained so 2.75 cap hit)
1st round pick
2nd round pick


Rangers get Nugent-Hopkins. 1st line center. Letestu would be our 4th line center. Would then have to move Brassard in a trade (which shouldn't be difficult as he put up low tier 1st line numbers the past two years and his contract is reasonable)

Edm get a top blue chip RW in Buchnevich. They get a much needed RHD in Girardi. Girardi cant be a 1st pairing dman anymore, but your kidding yourself if he cant slot below Larsson and be a solid rock. Oilers can use the picks to upgrade their team even more.

Horrible offer for both teams. Makes no sense at all
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
23,679
19,958
The Rangers send out 3.675 in cap and take back 7.8 mil in cap?

People should be required to complete a basic math course before being allowed to post trade proposals.
 
Last edited:

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
16,998
6,678
Halifax
NYR:
RNH
Letestu

EDM:
Buchnevich
Girardi (50% retained so 2.75 cap hit)
1st round pick
2nd round pick


Rangers get Nugent-Hopkins. 1st line center. Letestu would be our 4th line center. Would then have to move Brassard in a trade (which shouldn't be difficult as he put up low tier 1st line numbers the past two years and his contract is reasonable)

Edm get a top blue chip RW in Buchnevich. They get a much needed RHD in Girardi. Girardi cant be a 1st pairing dman anymore, but your kidding yourself if he cant slot below Larsson and be a solid rock. Oilers can use the picks to upgrade their team even more.


Girardi is as useless as Nikitin was .

Anyways neither team does it . Oilers maybe be deep at C but this would gut that . Also the Oilers are trying to come out of a rebuild and start competing so while the prospect and picks may have good value they are not what Edmonton needs right now . On the other hand if the NYR are looking to rebuild/even reload they may want to keep their high end prospect and picks . In a Vacuum I think the value would be in NYR favour . In the real world it not a trade they should make
 

Beer League Sniper

Homeless Man's Rick Nash
Apr 27, 2010
4,742
1,561
City in a Forest
The Rangers aren't going to offload a ton of assets just to dump Girardi. He's gone next summer, either by trade, expansion, or buyout. Buchnevich is our top prospect, and we're not sending out those picks as our prospect cupboard is pretty pathetic, and our front office knows it.

On top of this, RNH really doesn't fill a need for us. Our Top-9 Cs are Stepan, Brassard, and Hayes. RNH, at this point, isn't a clear upgrade on Stepan or Brassard, and we're not using that much cap and sending out our top prospect for, what would be for us, a 3C.

The value clearly isn't there for EDM either, so don't take this as me ripping on RNH.
 

StevenDean

Registered User
Jun 27, 2016
115
0
The Rangers are giving up their top prospect, picks they can't afford to trade and a garbage defenseman, for a guy they don't need in RNH and Letestu.

The Rangers have tremendous center depth, them trading for RNH is non sensical and unnecessary. Plus they lose a potential 1st line player, and picks, hence, it is a bad deal for them

Either way Girardi will be gone next summer, so trading priceless assets just to move him is also dumb


Dear god that was bad. You are worried about losing a POTENTIAL future top line player even though you are GETTING a top line player. You even dump Girardi. You say he will be gone next year but a buyout gives you a worse cap hit then 50% retention because of the signing bonuses with 3 extra years of cap. Check it out, it is true.

Since moving Girardi with the retention is better than buying him out for the sake of argument we will call his involvement a wash for NY. You trade a prospect who MAY become a top liner (more likely 2nd liner with still some chance of worse than that), a low first and second for a top line forward. That is a win every way you look at it.

I'm ok with saying that this deal doesn't fill a need and you would rather move those assets for something else or want to keep the cap space open for now, that is perfectly fair but don't pretend you are not getting a steal here value-wise. Heck because of the steal I would take this deal and move a center for a position of need. Win-win.

[mod]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BBKers

Registered User
Jan 9, 2006
11,126
7,519
Bialystok, Poland
No. Just no. Does nothing for either team IMO. Can it be bad for both teams?
I do however think we will see a NYR-EDM swap sooner than later - however with entirely other pieces involved.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad