HockeyinHD
Semi-retired former active poster.
- Jun 18, 2006
- 11,972
- 28
it's not exclusively RFA deal (nor UFA) deal. RFA deal only has RFA years on it and would remove many comparables. someone like johansen should be paid much more but has only RFA years on his deal and thus isn't paid more.
That is a silly distinction to make. We both know that being an RFA rather than a UFA has an downward impact on AAV, and that buying into those UFA years has an upward impact on AAV for obvious reasons. Many and perhaps nearly all of the guys who are making more than Nyquist are doing so in no small part because they are on contracts that buy farther into their UFA eligibility than Nyquist's deal does, so if you are comparing AAV's for those types of player and you are not taking that into account you are doing a poor job at accurately comparing them.
so... nyquist's 2 year contract extension in 2013 didn't happen?
Not as an NHL player, no it didn't. It'd be like counting Jensen's deal as his second RFA contract. If you aren't an NHL player yet we're talking apples and oranges in the contract department.
he's not on par with absolute best RFAs because then we'd have to include dman and goalies and there are many who make more than him.
Which is why we're talking about RFA forwards. You're trying to hide behind distinctions and exceptions that don't exist in an honest comparison at a position.
ok, i guess that depends on the definition of 'on par with absolute best'.. so if it's at the top 20% or so, yeah i guess he is.
If you're easily getting paid in the top 20 of RFA forwards, unless you're trying to say there are only 100 RFA forwards in the NHL he's rather higher up the chain than "top 20% or so". More like top 5-10%.