Volica
Papa Shango
- May 15, 2012
- 21,449
- 11,119
Why spam the main board with Leafs only threads.
Leafs fans should use their own board for this.
HFBoards is pretty much a Leafs board, so, you'll have to get used to that.
Why spam the main board with Leafs only threads.
Leafs fans should use their own board for this.
Especially since we get credit for other fans posting about the Leafs too.HFBoards is pretty much a Leafs board, so, you'll have to get used to that.
People look at it and say "Nylander for $8mil? Thats overpaid". Which it certainly would be at the moment, but by how much? $1-2 million max? Is that tiny amount of cap space worth the extreme value loss (Nylander >>> 1st/2nd/3rd)? The answer is most definitely no. The Leafs absolutely match an offer sheet like that 10 times out of 10.
Ehlers is comparable at $6 mm AAV.
Pasta is $6.6 mm
$8 is probably around $2 mm too much IMO. Is that worth walking over? Probably not, but it depends how tight to the cap they are after the Matthews signing.
The cap has risen since both those deals, so the comparable rises as well. I will be jumping for joy if we can sign Nylander for $6-milliom though.
Can't the Leafs just counter offer him a 7 million x 8 years then?
Secures Nylander an extra 15.5 million dollars long term and stays in Toronto playing with Matthews.
In short:
-If he gets offer sheeted short term 8.1m x 5, Leafs counter with term 7m x 8.
-If a team offers sheets 6m x 8 (2 1sts compensation), Leafs counter with more AAV 6.5-7m x 8
-If a team offers sheets 8m x 8 (4 1sts compensation), Leafs take the picks and leaves.
Also remember, before anything, the guy has to sign the offer sheet in the first place.
The offer sheet would only work on a super cap strapped team that literally don't have the space to even match a 6m contract. This is not the case here, Leafs have all the leverage in the world and that's why you're not seeing it already happen.
Where are you getting this from? I'm pretty sure this is wrong unless there is something I'm missing. For 2 1sts, a second, and a third, it has to be over 8.118 million and for four first round picks it has to be over 10.1 million. 6 million is a first and a third and 8 million is a first, second, and third. I'd imagine Leafs would match anything that isn't above 10.1 million. If a team offers 5 by 8.1, Nylander could consider it because, provided he continues to develop and doesn't have a sever injury, he will make more once he hits the UFA market. In terms of money, signing when you are 27 for 7 or 8 years at a UFA price is ideal because that takes you towards the end of your career and teams are willing to overpay. 8.1 means a first, second, and third, which isn't a great return for the Leafs but that also potentially complicates negotiations with other RFAs on the Leafs. Even if another team did 5 by 9 or so, I'd imagine the Leafs would consider possibly matching but I don't know how they feel about two firsts, a second, and a third if the team that offer sheets is middle tier and have cap room (NJD maybe?). Again this all provides he signs it or before he signs it, presents it to Dubas as leverage.
Also, can Leafs fans tell me their perspective if a team like NJD offered 5 by 9.5 million and assuming he signed it, what would you do? Match it or leave it? NJD would get better and can probably make the playoffs again so that would be mid-late picks in each round presumably. Genuinely curious at that possibility since it seems to handcuff them a little.
Remember offer sheets work so that any AAV compensation calculation is spread over 5 years maximum.
So say 8x8 offer sheets = 64 million
64m/ 5 years= 12.8 million dollar compensation range.
And of course if someone offers 9 million x 5 years then the AAV is 9.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Where are you getting this from? I'm pretty sure this is wrong unless there is something I'm missing. For 2 1sts, a second, and a third, it has to be over 8.118 million and for four first round picks it has to be over 10.1 million. 6 million is a first and a third and 8 million is a first, second, and third. I'd imagine Leafs would match anything that isn't above 10.1 million. If a team offers 5 by 8.1, Nylander could consider it because, provided he continues to develop and doesn't have a sever injury, he will make more once he hits the UFA market. In terms of money, signing when you are 27 for 7 or 8 years at a UFA price is ideal because that takes you towards the end of your career and teams are willing to overpay. 8.1 means a first, second, and third, which isn't a great return for the Leafs but that also potentially complicates negotiations with other RFAs on the Leafs. Even if another team did 5 by 9 or so, I'd imagine the Leafs would consider possibly matching but I don't know how they feel about two firsts, a second, and a third if the team that offer sheets is middle tier and have cap room (NJD maybe?). Again this all provides he signs it or before he signs it, presents it to Dubas as leverage.
Also, can Leafs fans tell me their perspective if a team like NJD offered 5 by 9.5 million and assuming he signed it, what would you do? Match it or leave it? NJD would get better and can probably make the playoffs again so that would be mid-late picks in each round presumably. Genuinely curious at that possibility since it seems to handcuff them a little.
Awesome, didn't realize that part. I thought it was just AAV for the contract. Thanks!
I don't think an Offer Sheet can be 8 years, 7 would be the max.Remember offer sheets work so that any AAV compensation calculation is spread over 5 years maximum.
So say 8x8 offer sheets = 64 million
64m/ 5 years= 12.8 million dollar compensation range.
And of course if someone offers 9 million x 5 years then the AAV is 9.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Ehlers contract starts this year.The cap has risen since both those deals, so the comparable rises as well. I will be jumping for joy if we can sign Nylander for $6-milliom though.
Walking from a player like Nylander/Pasternak/Ehlers over $2-million per on a long term deal is a move that should see the GM get fired immediately. You can find $2-mill in space in plenty of places on the roster, you make room for elite talent.
It was signed last year in October before anyone knew how the cap would change this offseason.Ehlers contract starts this year.
It was signed last year in October before anyone knew how the cap would change this offseason.
Ehlers is comparable at $6 mm AAV.
Pasta is $6.6 mm
$8 is probably around $2 mm too much IMO. Is that worth walking over? Probably not, but it depends how tight to the cap they are after the Matthews signing.
Under the B...7....BINGO!!Both good comparables, Ehlers especially since they were drafted right next to eachother, have both not really been "the guy" on their line and have eerily similar numbers in their last two seasons.
Personally I think Ehlers is slightly better but it's not enough of a difference to argue. The cap has risen roughly 6%, so going from Ehlers' deal: if you just strictly gave him the 6% raise top reflect cap he'd be at about 6.35, but he also has one more productive season under his belt that I think gives him a slight boost.
I think he's going to land at Pasta's exact money but with an additional year. I don't see how he could possibly ask for anything higher than 7 based on his comparables, and don't see how the Leafs could offer less than 6 for the same reason
Arizona has 15m? lolIf I'm Arizona, I start the campaign of landing Matthews by making Toronto match an offer sheet on Nylander, then Marner, then see how they feel about matching 15m on Matthews
For sure because those players are just dying to play in Arizona.If I'm Arizona, I start the campaign of landing Matthews by making Toronto match an offer sheet on Nylander, then Marner, then see how they feel about matching 15m on Matthews