My point is I don't think Nylander wants to sign a long-term deal until Matthews signs his. I don't think the Leafs want to offer a bridge deal because they know Nylander's cost will only go up. They want to lock all these players down now.
Ok, fair enough.
A bridge deal might be the solution. Obviously that's what happened with Morrissey/Nurse when negotiations on a long-term deal weren't working.
Long-term deal is ideal for the Leafs, but a bridge deal is still fine. It gives the Leafs a few years to see how their blueline develops, and see if they do still need a legit upgrade there. With the addition of Tavares, we have the flexibility to move a big piece up front.
If Nylander after the bridge deal prices himself out of Toronto, or if Liljegren/Sandin/etc don't develop as hoped, we can move him in a deal to improve the blueline.
And I'm saying that as a big fan of Nylander, I bought a Nylander jersey last year rather than a Marner or Matthews one. But the team comes first, and if it makes sense to move him, then the Leafs should do that (and a bridge deal makes that a lot more likely IMO).