I think a lot of people are in agreement that when Washington traded Filip Forsberg for Martin Erat it was one of the worst trades of all time. However now that they just won a Stanley Cup will this trade no longer need to be brought up or should it still get mentioned when it comes to all time bad NHL trades?
I have always hated when HF users say the hyperbole that I'm about to, but this might actually be the worst thread I've ever seen.
1) That trade was, is, and always will be a
terrible trade any way you slice it.
2) This Stanley Cup, five years later or not, has absolutely
nothing to do with the players they acquired in the deal.
3) To even suggest this trade has anything to do with their Stanley Cup win implies that you are suggesting if Forsberg was still a Cap they would
not have won it.