Doing this means we lose Carrick.. Our only legit RD after Zaitsev in the org for free...
The assets better be worth it.. A 2nd or 3rd means nothing to losing Carrick + taking back a cap dump + whatever we give up.
To me it comes down to
a) How good is the NMC player?
b) How long is the contract
c) Are they giving enough + to make it worth while.
a) Hartnel is good, and can easily play top 9 minutes on the wing. Even if they Leafs dont loose anyone else/ dont add anyone else he could (weirdly) become the 4th line winger replacing Sosh. Having a 4th line of Martin (ugh) - Boyle - Harts would be one of the best in the NHL. My hope would be put him with Bozak and Marner, trade JVR for D help/ good prospects.
b) The contract is 2 years and under 5 million. This fits perfectly for the Leafs who will need to resign Matthews and Marner right when his contract ends. Any contract over 2 years IMO is not tenable.
c) The+ is Paul Bittner and 2nd rd pick in 2018. Bittner was drafted with some good regrard and is still young but super struggled last year in the A. Not a horrible prospect, but Leafs would prefer a D or a C. Preference for me would be Kevin Stenlund who had a relatively good draft +1 year.
Now the last point for me, is what is the difference between what we add and what we loose. Deal only makes sense if we can move JVR around the same time for a D so we dont have to worry about losing another player OR if the return is enough to bribe VGK to take Marincin over Carrick. (I.e Marincin/Leivo plus a 3rd/4h instead of Carrick.)
In this scenario the deal ends up being for the Leafs:
Hartnel+Prospect+2nd in
Marincin+3rd+Soshnikov out and getting to still keep Carrick.
IMO that makes the team better next year, doesnt hurt the cap long term, and gives us a few other young pieces.