I think Merrill and Larsson could have spent more time at the very start of their career's in Albany. Moreso Larsson given how young he was.
Both suffered a bit from some initial good play in NJ only to see their game slide back. Lar's game has rebounded, haven't seen it yet from Merrill. Hopefully this season we see the bounce back.
This is what I have a problem with...What Merrill did this season people would've called good games from Larsson 3 years ago.... A game he wasn't beat people declared "solid" especially the period when he was paired with Gelinas right before he was sent down...Some were claiming it was great hockey..Great hockey not getting beat regularly...If you say so? I didn't see that way.
Where is that sort of leniency and rose colored glass for Merrill who is at the exact same experience level Larsson was then? This is what I don't get....Not only that, Merrill's performance this season was leaps and bounds better than what Larsson gave at any point from the second half of year 1, year two, three and parts of year 4.
We seems to want to wash that period away as he was young...And apparently Merrill was/is not....that is ludicrous.
Young defenders need time. I don't care who they are and what there exact age is. You look at someone like Greene or Oduya...Hell, Oduya was 25 years old with 3 years of Pro experience in the Swedish Elite league and still took a solid 150 games to adjust and learn the NHL game. This is guy who went on to have a very solid career but if you remember the first year and half it wasn't all that pretty.
I can't think of too many defenders to have ever hit the ground running without any warts and ugliness.