Good for DeSimone to get put on Waivers right as there was a team that just needed a body and probably would have claimed whomever the next D that knows what an NHL arena looks like to hit the wire was.
Would appreaciate that - wins for everyone!Sometimes it happens that way. It also wouldn't surprise me if he's back with the Flames AHL club in a couple weeks when the Devils start to get bodies back.
$775K/$325K 2-way contract, so any additional NHL service time results in a not insubstantial amount more coin in his pocket.Sometimes it happens that way. It also wouldn't surprise me if he's back with the Flames AHL club in a couple weeks when the Devils start to get bodies back.
* and had a buryable salary. The Devils wouldn’t have grabbed such a warm body if there was any relevant cap implication. They needed a warm body whose nhl cap hit drops to 0 if and when he gets sent to the minors.Good for DeSimone to get put on Waivers right as there was a team that just needed a body and probably would have claimed whomever the next D that knows what an NHL arena looks like to hit the wire was.
* and had a buryable salary. The Devils wouldn’t have grabbed such a warm body if there was any relevant cap implication. They needed a warm body whose nhl cap hit drops to 0 if and when he gets sent to the minors.
Surprised the Flames couldn't even get a pick for him - even if it was only a 7th.
Trades are cheaper than waivers so yes, that would be better for both parties.Or even a bag of pucks
If he gets sent to the minors there's almost a 100% chance that at least Calgary puts in a claim.
No chance the Devils could bury him in their farm system this season.
Not exactly. If CGY trades him for future considerations and NJD puts him back on waivers, if nobody makes a claim to put him on the NHL, he goes to the Devils AHL affiliate. If CGY doesn’t trade him and the Devils put him back in waivers, then if CGY puts in a claim and nobody else makes a claim, he’d go automatically to CGY’s AHL affiliate.Trades are cheaper than waivers so yes, that would be better for both parties.
THIS. Why did we waive the better guy? I'm not saying it's the end of the world losing DeSimone, but wouldn't it have been better to lose Oesterle?He's better than Jordan f***ing Oesterle
Good to know - thanks. I thought it was just a general principle that trades cost less than waivers.Not exactly. If CGY trades him for future considerations and NJD puts him back on waivers, if nobody makes a claim to put him on the NHL, he goes to the Devils AHL affiliate. If CGY doesn’t trade him and the Devils put him back in waivers, then if CGY puts in a claim and nobody else makes a claim, he’d go automatically to CGY’s AHL affiliate.
So a trade for nothing is a greater “cutting the bait” than putting a player through waivers even if you knew somebody would claim him.
This could be relevant for the Hawks who recently picked up Jayson Megna and Zach Sanford off waivers and traded a conditional seventh for Rem Pitlick. As players get healthy, they may consider putting a guy or two from there back on waivers. Pittsburgh would have no special right to make a waiver claim for Pitlick just to send him back to Wilkes-Barre.