DANOZ28
Registered User
i hated losing clutterbuck but trading for nino will probably always be one of fletch's best moves.
Didn't see this posted. Yet another interesting article from TSN's Travis Yost: http://www.tsn.ca/the-incredible-career-trajectory-of-nino-niederreiter-1.843926
Here are a few more amazing stat lines. The only player that played a full season with Niederreiter and had a Corsi For greater than 50 percent without Niederreiter was Jason Pominville, who was traded to the Buffalo Sabres in June.
No player that played at least 100 minutes with Niederreiter had a Corsi For of less than 50 percent. No player that played at least 100 minutes with Niederreiter had less than 54 percent Goals For. Possession impact doesn't get much better than that.
The rise of Niederreiter is pretty astounding. He did all this despite ranking sixth among Wild forward,s and 123rd among NHL forwards, in even-strength ice time (1,071 minutes, 16 seconds).
Most impressive, Niederreiter ranked sixth among forwards in ice time at 5-on-5 (1,047 minutes, 49 seconds) last season for the Wild.
To better compare his scoring production, his point production can be converted to a rate per 60 minutes of ice time. This equalizes everyone's scoring and making it easier to compare across players with different levels of playing time. As you can see, only five players in the NHL contributed at a higher rate. Of these top 10 players, only Niederreiter and Connor McDavid had a relatively normal shooting percentage (a measure that can generally predict whether a trend is likely to continue or not). Niederreiter was at 10.88 percent, McDavid at 10.99 percent.
I think his production would climb a bit, but I don't think it's as simple as saying that he will stay the same player, with the same impact, in more time on ice (fatigue) and with different tiers of opponents matching up against him. It is a great article though, and I think Derek did a great job explaining how some of the advanced stats work for those who are novices to it. Nino's the kind of player that you give a bigger opportunity to until his impact starts to decline, because he's clearly capable of being one of the best players in the league at his current role. See how far he can climb! Give him some rope.
And while it sucks...injuries happen and there isn't anyway to forsee it.I think we are forgetting how much of a hit it is that Parise is contributing nothing, while eating up 7.5M of cap every year.
Well they have and there not really getting any help at all.I dont think it is a stretch to say that the Wild now are going to live or die on the backs of Nino, Granlund, Coyle, and Zucker. If those 4 can take the next step and become stars, the Wild might be something. If not, this team isnt going anywhere.
No not at all.I've been listening to away market feeds recently and I keep hearing announcers talk about Nino as being "streaky." Anybody else echo that sentiment? I guess I can see it from a scoring standpoint, but he does so many other things well.
Overall I'd say he and Staal are the most consistent forwards on the team at this point.I've been listening to away market feeds recently and I keep hearing announcers talk about Nino as being "streaky." Anybody else echo that sentiment? I guess I can see it from a scoring standpoint, but he does so many other things well.
I've been listening to away market feeds recently and I keep hearing announcers talk about Nino as being "streaky." Anybody else echo that sentiment? I guess I can see it from a scoring standpoint, but he does so many other things well.
Actually, yes, 100% in previous years. He'd have dominant stretches and then just disappear for like 15 games. This year, and most of last year, he has indeed been one of the most consistent forwards on the team.I've been listening to away market feeds recently and I keep hearing announcers talk about Nino as being "streaky." Anybody else echo that sentiment? I guess I can see it from a scoring standpoint, but he does so many other things well.
I guess I haven't noticed him being appreciably worse in his own end than most of the other forwards, but I haven't been looking for it either. And I don't think I'd call him a great defensive player; he's an okay defensive player and a great possession player. His biggest contribution to defense is keeping the puck in the offensive zone.I keep hearing he is a great defensive player, but I don't see it. Don't get me wrong, I love having his scoring touch, size, and feistiness on the team, but he can be a bit careless with the puck leaving the zone. Nothing terrible, but it's there. Also, for a guy who is supposedly a great all round player he sure doesn't get comeasurate TOI. Maybe the coaches have the same reservations i do about some of his play?
He's had some egregious turnovers in the d-zone this year leading directly to goals. It's a little odd as I've never noticed those awful turnovers consistently in previous years, but he had a stretch earlier in the year where he was turning them over left and right. I haven't noticed any lately, though.I keep hearing he is a great defensive player, but I don't see it. Don't get me wrong, I love having his scoring touch, size, and feistiness on the team, but he can be a bit careless with the puck leaving the zone. Nothing terrible, but it's there. Also, for a guy who is supposedly a great all round player he sure doesn't get comeasurate TOI. Maybe the coaches have the same reservations i do about some of his play?