Alexyev- Best physical tools/upside.
Sandin- Lowest upside offensively.....very high hockey IQ and a good stick. I wasn't a huge fan of the pick due to his lack of dynamic ability/explosiveness and because I've seen him get manhandled in front of the net, or with any player that picks up speed on him....and because I think that problem will become bigger in the NHL if his lower body strength doesn't improve profoundly. With all that said, if his hockey IQ translates, he will end up as a very good pick as he is probably the smartest defender in the draft in terms of closing gaps, reading/evading pressure through 200 feet of ice (actually before the draft, I posted that he reminded me of a smarter Carrick- right down to the problem of getting manhandled semi-regularly). The problem is these type of players, with just good (and not great tools) are very hard to project entering the next level purely on hockey smarts alone.
Lundqvist
Wilde
For me, that was my list before the draft, and have been pretty consistent most of the year that I wasn't too high on Wilde. I think he has tools that are a bit overstated, to begin with, and his hockey IQ and reads are as questionable as any D prospect that was considered a 1st rounder (yes, I know he wasn't drafted in the 1st)...despite a lot of the USNTDP games looking like a pond-hockey game. Still, at his slot, he was good to take a flyer on IMO.