- May 4, 2004
- 5,343
- 16,837
I know it can't be a bad thing for any GM to have your best forward lockup for 8 yrs, but it's surprising that a GM that it supposed to not be back next year sign that kind of extension
Yes, but that is a major decision but it's a move that any GM would be confutable withWell if they did not want MB to make decisions he should be canned.
Very MB-style though. He did the same with a couple other of our core players - settle extension wayyy early. Seems like it's a good thing imo, the Gallagher and Petry contract were under market, I'm hopeful the Suzuki one will be under market too.
Anyone who has time should watch the Craig Rivet Trade tree Dangle did, it's insane what we still have from himCraig Rivet. The gift that keeps on giving...
I know it can't be a bad thing for any GM to have your best forward lockup for 8 yrs, but it's surprising that a GM that it supposed to not be back next year sign that kind of extension
The two have absolutely nothing to do with each other imo. Totally different situationsWell Bergy is learning from the KK fiasco