MMC
Global Moderator
8 points in his last 7 games. 9 points in 12 games this season. After many years of being labelled a bust or disappointment, it seems he's finally hitting his potential.
Last edited:
Somewhere...Don Cherry is thrilled.
Our GM was happy with how serious he seemed to take training and improving his game over the offseason, we're now seeing the results .Power forwards take longer ... where did I hear that before . Would explain Jake Virtanen 's better play as well . I like the big guys they bring a lot to the table you can't teach . Happy for him .
I think that's a bit too much sarcasm for that salad, but you do you.I too feel this 7 game sample size is more than conclusive. Andrew Shaw had 6 goals and 9 points in 8 games after moving to the top line for MTL, how many first round picks can we get for him?
I think that's a bit too much sarcasm for that salad, but you do you.
No one is saying Ritchie is now a star. Just that he's not yet a bust. Relax.
I think that's a bit too much sarcasm for that salad, but you do you.
No one is saying Ritchie is now a star. Just that he's not yet a bust. Relax.
Saying he has arrived and that it seems he's finally hitting his potential is a bold statement to make after a small amount of good games.
Saying a player has arrived is a far cry from being facetious about a player being worth 1 or more first rounders.If that's what they meant then they should have said that. If anyone needs to relax its anyone drawing long term conclusions off a 7 game sample size.
Saying a player has arrived is a far cry from being facetious about a player being worth 1 or more first rounders.
Don't get me wrong. I don't think this merited a thread, but I also found the sarcasm a bit absurd.
Saying a player has arrived is a far cry from being facetious about a player being worth 1 or more first rounders.
Don't get me wrong. I don't think this merited a thread, but I also found the sarcasm a bit absurd.
That's not what made it ridiculous. What made it ridiculous is the lengths you went to make it about your team and sensationally obtuse in the same breath.Saying a player has arrived means that you think they will be able to repeat what they are currently doing. If OP believes we should only judge Ritchie (a player with 200 nhl games played) based on a specific 7 game sample size then it is no more ridiculous to judge another player based on an 8 game sample size. If we are now expecting Shaw to go .75GPG and and PPG+ then I would expect at least a few firsts for him.
Too bad judging players based on such a same sample size is ridiculous (my whole point, which you are ignoring based on how you didn't enjoy my sarcasm?).
That's not what made it ridiculous. What made it ridiculous is the lengths you went to make it about your team and sensationally obtuse in the same breath.
You're the one who keeps responding to me. I thought the content was silly. We don't have to keep talking about it.The only reason I picked a player from my team was because I happened to know a stat off the top of my head that showed how ridiculous the OP was. If I happened to know a stat about a different player I would have used that but, strangely, my own team is the one I know best. If you're concerned about someone going to great lengths to try and make a ridiculous point maybe consider that you've made 3 posts now because you thought my sarcasm was a little too sarcastic.
You're the one who keeps responding to me. I thought the content was silly. We don't have to keep talking about it.
It was apt until you started prissing on about how Montreal should start hunting for multiple first rounders. It flies well past anything that has been claimed by OP or anyone else and it just appeared like histrionics to me. But this is more time I really feel this subject even deserves so, have a good night.To be fair, I believe we are responding to each other. I made a comparison that I felt (and still feel) was apt, if its criticized I am going to respond.