2013 Hawks would have turned last year's Pens into children.
Prime Toews dominates Sidney while you were deploying Kruger/Frolik against Malkin along with a top four defense in their prime that could stop anybody.
The Pens stick out like a sore thumb on that list and Imo, the 13 Hawks deserve to be there instead. Just that much better. Not taking anything away from the Pens, they were a fun little team to watch, but still a notch (or two) below the first two Hawks championship teams.
They compare much, much closer to the 15 Hawks, which was the weakest of the Hawks champions
I think you're underrating the 16 Penguins here.
I think 2013 Blackhawks do come out on top eventually, for some of the matchup reasons you brought up (though I think it's a stretch to assume Toews would 'dominate' Crosby, even with Saad and Hossa flanking him... Crosby is still gonna do some damage)
...but mostly for the fact that they had a deeper, better defense corp in 2013 than Pittsburgh did in 2016, and 2013 Crawford was playing on par with 2016 Murray give-or-take.
Also, I think the 2013 Hawks team is the only team in recent memory that had the ability to play as blazing fast in all zones as the 2016 Penguins. Maybe not quite as fast, but close enough to mitigate the advantage.
But they certainly wouldn't 'turn them to children'. I'd say 6 or 7 close, amazing games.
Personally, I think you replace the 2010 Blackhawks (who I think the 2016 Pens beat in 6, because the 2010 team was NOT good defensively and had Niemi in net as 'please don't **** this up guy') with the 2013 Blackhawks, add the 2008 Red Wings and the cap era is properly supported on this list.