Seems like NHL urges potential markets to quickly build their arenas, then they force them to test run those arenas anywhere from 3 to 5 years before they get a chance at a team...and then 10 years later, they have team owners cry out loud their arena is outdated and not competitive.
It's nice having a brand new car, but it's less nice when you store that brand new car for the first 5 years, then once the warranty is expired...you start driving it daily and start complaining about how a bad car it is.
Edit :
Honestly, what would be really nice is for NBA to go and either move or expand a franchise into Vegas, and pull the rug on which NHL is standing and claiming they are the first pro-sports league to step into this amazing market.
If the NBA did that, it would be amazing, further reinforcing the view of the NHL as 'bush' league in 'awarding' franchises...
Seems like NHL urges potential markets to quickly build their arenas, then they force them to test run those arenas anywhere from 3 to 5 years before they get a chance at a team...and then 10 years later, they have team owners cry out loud their arena is outdated and not competitive.
It's nice having a brand new car, but it's less nice when you store that brand new car for the first 5 years, then once the warranty is expired...you start driving it daily and start complaining about how a bad car it is.
Edit :
Honestly, what would be really nice is for NBA to go and either move or expand a franchise into Vegas, and pull the rug on which NHL is standing and claiming they are the first pro-sports league to step into this amazing market.
I understand what you are saying and I wish I had the tools to keep my confidence up as you do it.
But look at it the other way. Foley has an arena. It's built and paid for. What can he do other than manage it the best he can and get as much events as he can to get some profits in.
You don't build an arena to leave it standing still waiting for NHL.
Another thing that struck me now that you talked about it...in Quebec, NHL lockerooms aren't finished, Remparts coach has his office inside what is supposed to the official X-Ray room in the arena. Now that I think about it, I can't help but ask myself why.
As far as the relocation scenario I put forth in the aforementioned thread and the bad juju that comes with a relocation; we're going to get that anyways. Certainly from Canadians and almost assuredly from a good portion of other fans. What's the issue with getting a little more from Phoenix if it happens? It's just not a concern for me anymore. Like I said, I hate to see someone lose their team, but almost every single scenario that can play out in Phoenix ends with the Coyotes leaving, they might as well move somewhere at least somewhat accessible for the 20% of Coyotes fans that will maintain their relationship with the team regardless of where it moves.
My real issue with all of that is that everyone knew those issues wouldn't be resolved anytime soon when the Vegas ticket drive was announced. They certainly weren't going to get resolved when they go ahead was given for the ticket drive to start. Same for phase 1/2/3 of expansion.
Why the kabuki?
I do have an answer in my head, but I'm just curious what others think.
My real issue with all of that is that everyone knew those issues wouldn't be resolved anytime soon when the Vegas ticket drive was announced. They certainly weren't going to get resolved when they go ahead was given for the ticket drive to start. Same for phase 1/2/3 of expansion.
Why the kabuki?
I do have an answer in my head, but I'm just curious what others think.
Okay, we're on the same page.
I think this thing started making the move from expansion to relocation as soon as the Glendale thing happened. They've got outs now. I did a pretty cursory breakdown of the difference to the individual teams/governors using an expansion versus relocation scenario on one of the last pages of the last thread.
Assuming my information and analysis are somewhat sound, it makes more sense monetarily to move a team like the Coyotes after 1-2 years versus taking a one time payment for expansion.
Okay, we're on the same page.
I think this thing started making the move from expansion to relocation as soon as the Glendale thing happened. They've got outs now. I did a pretty cursory breakdown of the difference to the individual teams/governors using an expansion versus relocation scenario on one of the last pages of the last thread.
Assuming my information and analysis are somewhat sound, it makes more sense monetarily to move a team like the Coyotes after 1-2 years versus taking a one time payment for expansion.
The league always had other options for the coyotes than vegas. Portland and Seattle (once their arena gets taken care off)
They still get their 500m in expansion while addressing the coyotes.
The league always had other options for the coyotes than vegas. Portland and Seattle (once their arena gets taken care off)
They still get their 500m in expansion while addressing the coyotes.
Las Vegas getting the NBA makes more sense to me than the NHL getting it, still don't buy Vegas as a NHL market at all.
Las Vegas getting the NBA makes more sense to me than the NHL getting it, still don't buy Vegas as a NHL market at all.
Should have multi responded, my fault.
The excitement here was really something to see when this all came out, it really got me feeling good about the prospects. I'm not a huge Vegas sunshine pumper, this isn't a slam dunk market for hockey. It is a lot stronger than many would expect though based on the data that's out there and I've shared in previous iterations of the Vegas thread. We can go back into it if there's an appetite for regurgitated info.
I actually think hockey would do better than basketball here, but that's just a personal opinion based on what I know about the city and the response I've seen. Plus, the NBA has got some bigger fish to fry in Seattle and perhaps Montreal. There's even some similarly sized fish in Virginia and Kentucky they may want to approach as well.
MGM isn't super interested in basketball from what I've seen, and until there's another arena in town (and there is at least one "in the works") I don't see the NBA putting a claim on Vegas. That is 100% okay with me in general and specifically as it relates to the potential hockey team.
...
There were some problem at Vegas when the NBA played their all star game there to where NBA wasn't happy with.
It was actually the opposite. The NBA wasn't happy with the arena, which was to be expected out of a thirty year old arena and would be remedied by the new arena. However, they were complimentary about the city and experience.
MGM (and the city in general, for that matter) wasn't happy with the NBA clientele and the issues associated with that. Since this arena, and by extension the team that plays within the arena, is essentially a way for MGM Resorts to funnel people into their properties, they are pretty sour on the idea of an NBA team in Vegas. The CEO of MGM Resorts has not made that a secret.
BattleBorn said:You know my stance. Foley has an MOU to purchase the Coyotes if they don't have a plan by X date. I just wonder what the date is.
Does June 10, 2015 sound about right?
NHL is going not going to get very a lot out of the coyotes going to vegas for an relocation fee. Most of that $$$ for that sale would go to the owners very little to the league. Vegas is not a superior market to phoenix (no offense to vegas folks).