Too bad Los Angeles, even after TWO recent Cups and hosting a Stadium Series, and the number 2 tv market, can no longer be counted on to draw tv viewers in such a spectacle played somewhat near them. Maybe the NHL has somewhat given up on LA, as the Kings and Ducks just have too much to compete with including two MLS teams and the NFL once again.
Maybe the NHL had somewhat given up on LA, as there's too much competition now with two NFL and and two MLS teams to boot.
Las Vegas is what, only the number 38 or so tv market?
LA was counted on for years: wasn't LA vs Colorado a pre-season staple for years in Las Vegas, before the VGK arrived? And Rangers vs. LA played several exhibition games many moons ago in Las Vegas (including an outdoor game or two?).
Yes, it's good that Vegas will be shown as they have shown solid local TV ratings (and usually top neutral ratings when they're ever published), but according to my research, isn't the LA market much, much closer to Lake Tahoe than Vegas is? Heck, Nevada itself is huge, as it takes seven hours or so to drive from Reno to Las Vegas?
...
Pardon my east coast ignorance, but Lake Tahoe is partly in California and in Nevada? Is one part more popular or fun and thus gets more visitors? Is it mostly in California? Is most of it normal people living normal lives, over generations, or mainly vacationers and hotels and Airbnb? Does it take a few hours to drive the entire area? Average incomes overall, or mainly upper income and higher? It's always puzzled me as I hear about it, but have never visited. Are Sacramento or even San Francisco the nearest major airports? Isn't the Las Vegas airport much farther?
Why not Rangers vs. Bruins? Bigger tv market and Panarin, Kaako and Lafreniere to promote.
But interesting vrntue, and I'll watch both games.