I'd be more worried about the expansion draft.
That would be the one time I'd be happy if Boulton, Carkner, and Strait are still on the roster.
agreed...
as of now we would be in good shape but when our team is packed with all our young talent, someone important is bound to be left unprotected.
Would be great if it were this year and we could get out of Baileys contract and open a spot for Lee...Would be a bonus if a team was dumb enough to take Carkner.
I'm not getting worked up about a hockey story by SI, let alone one that is based off of a tweet by some guy none of us have ever heard of, who has less than 7k followers and runs a website we've never heard of. Insane how much the hockey world has reacted to this.
That said, I could see an expansion to 32 teams by adding a Vegas and Seattle, just based off current league alignment. But it's absolutely ridiculous to expand into the largest league in American sports. Let that sink in. Never going to happen.
But it is the only one with a strong presence in Canada. The NHL does have the largest current footprint of any North American league. And I'd be surprised if an expansion does not include Quebec City.
Same here, Quebec City has doubled in population since the Nordiques bid the league adieu for rockier pastures. Never should have left, and makes even more sense to bring them back; especially with the new TVA broadcasting deal.
Man hopefully the league doesn't get watered down. I am glad the islanders are young and coming out of rebuild and has new owners so we can retain some of those players when they hit free agency. Those new teams are going to be poaching players for ridiculous prices and having all of the early draft picks. Good luck trying to rebuild or sign players when these teams are in their early days.
I've seen research on baseball suggesting expansion doesn't lead to any long-term watering down affect. Not sure how NHL would differ though, since unlike in hockey MLB teams can sign talent that was never eligible for the draft, meaning each new MLB team spending resources on unearthing talent could actually be increasing the talent pool.
I still hold a grudge that the Trashers' expansion led to us missing out on Kovalchuk. Milbury supposedly loved Kovalchuk and would have definitely kept that pick.
I just can't imagine Mike Milbury doing something smart though, can you?
I'm not getting worked up about a hockey story by SI, let alone one that is based off of a tweet by some guy none of us have ever heard of, who has less than 7k followers and runs a website we've never heard of. Insane how much the hockey world has reacted to this.
That said, I could see an expansion to 32 teams by adding a Vegas and Seattle, just based off current league alignment. But it's absolutely ridiculous to expand into the largest league in American sports. Let that sink in. Never going to happen.
I don't think Bailey has a bad contract. 3.3m for a 0.5ppg player is nothing to sneeze at. cf In re: Contract of David Clarkson.
(cf is a shorthand for "compare")
Unlike Winnipeg, where there were sellouts every night, oddly enough, Quebec did not support their team like Wniipeg did.
Unlike Winnipeg, where there were sellouts every night, oddly enough, Quebec did not support their team like Wniipeg did.
The league has denied this since it was leaked: http://www.thestar.com/sports/hocke...am_could_be_on_its_way_to_toronto_report.html
Although, that could be them just covering up something that got leaked before they were ready.
My gut says adding 4 teams would be ridiculous, and bad for the league.
Not sure where you got Ottawa from but I admit I thought similarly when I read the expansion news... If the 2 new guys cut a backroom deal with the NHL and can move the team to Vegas or Seattle if Brooklyn fails it would explain why they overpaid
The league has denied this since it was leaked: http://www.thestar.com/sports/hocke...am_could_be_on_its_way_to_toronto_report.html
Although, that could be them just covering up something that got leaked before they were ready.
My gut says adding 4 teams would be ridiculous, and bad for the league.
goofiness aside, $540M wouldn't be a bad investment to get the first pro team in vegas...
And if the NHL is looking to move to 4 new cities I highly doubt they are looking to create 4 new teams. Which teams would be most likely to relocate? PHX, FLA, NYI?
I'm not getting worked up about a hockey story by SI, let alone one that is based off of a tweet by some guy none of us have ever heard of, who has less than 7k followers and runs a website we've never heard of. Insane how much the hockey world has reacted to this.
That said, I could see an expansion to 32 teams by adding a Vegas and Seattle, just based off current league alignment. But it's absolutely ridiculous to expand into the largest league in American sports. Let that sink in. Never going to happen.
I hope they're actually denying it. Vegas would be a disaster in the NHL. Worse than what's going on in Arizona right now, and that's saying something. The ideal situation would be expansion to Seattle and Portland. Both cities who have been clamoring for an NHL team.
As much as I want Quebec to have a team, I don't think it can happen unless a team like Florida relocates. You'd probably want to even out the conferences and Seattle and Portland definitely fit the mold for a 16/16 alignment.
Of course they want 4 new ones. Think like an owner - do you want to get 2 shares of expansion fees or 4 shares of expansion fees?goofiness aside, $540M wouldn't be a bad investment to get the first pro team in vegas...
And if the NHL is looking to move to 4 new cities I highly doubt they are looking to create 4 new teams. Which teams would be most likely to relocate? PHX, FLA, NYI?