Breaking my heart with Pekar there, might be a fan favorite if he makes itNylander for Vesey
1st-2020 McCabe Pekar for Zucker
etc.
Eh, Bakes saw this pick (Goalie at #67) coming this morning and predicted who we would possibly take. That’s before the run on goalies.Everything botterill does seems to be reactionary and without proof of ANY ****ing plan of attack whatsoever.
At least we have Eichel, Dahlin, Reinhart and Tage to build upon...
Baker liked the pick at 122, and threw a floating caveat about viability in the third just to be a good guy and a team playerEh, Bakes saw this pick (Goalie at #67) coming this morning and predicted who we would possibly take. That’s before the run on goalies.
He said it this morning before the Draft started today.Baker liked the pick at 122, and threw a floating caveat about viability in the third just to be a good guy and a team player
Lede being buried by this tweet: there was virtually no way in hell he wouldn't have been available in the 4th round, and very likely the 5th or 6th as well. Also remember: taking a goalie in the 3rd round = NFL team taking a kicker in the 3rd round. Unless you end up with an all star level guy it's a terrible idea.
Recall the slamming of Botterill 2 years ago after taking some kid named Oskari Laaksonen in the 3rd round. Pretty much no one had ANY idea who he was, how tall he was or how much he weighed. Completely, totally off the board pick and HFboards hated him for it.
Oops.
Recall the slamming of Botterill 2 years ago after taking some kid named Oskari Laaksonen in the 3rd round. Pretty much no one had ANY idea who he was, how tall he was or how much he weighed. Completely, totally off the board pick and HFboards hated him for it.
Oops.
Yet he still has proven nothing. Let’s wait until they make the team before declaring them home runs.
My point is: It takes a couple of years to really know what we get in any draft.
The unyielding slamming of Botts over kids that won't be Sabres for 3 years (give or take) is highly curious to me.
And I'll respond to this by pointing out if the guy was a non entity nobody else was going to draft then taking Laaksonen in the 3rd instead of the 5th was still bad asset management. Also Laaksonen was not a goalie (a position you should almost never use a high pick on).Recall the slamming of Botterill 2 years ago after taking some kid named Oskari Laaksonen in the 3rd round. Pretty much no one had ANY idea who he was, how tall he was or how much he weighed. Completely, totally off the board pick and HFboards hated him for it.
Oops.
Third rounders aren’t high picks in hockeyAnd I'll respond to this by pointing out if the guy was a non entity nobody else was going to draft then taking Laaksonen in the 3rd instead of the 5th was still bad asset management. Also Laaksonen was not a goalie (a position you should almost never use a high pick on).
And I'll respond to this by pointing out if the guy was a non entity nobody else was going to draft then taking Laaksonen in the 3rd instead of the 5th was still bad asset management. Also Laaksonen was not a goalie (a position you should almost never use a high pick on).
Is Tag Bertuzzi anything like his brother? If so I’d be game to take him at 122