NHL 15 Islanders Ratings

[Deadweight]

For those of you interested in the ratings for EA NHL 15

Listed by Be a GM mode trade value:

Tavares 91
Okposo 88
Dal Colle 69
Reinhardt 76
Strome 81
Pulock 58
Nielsen 85
Grabovski 85
Grabner 84
Kulemin 84
Cizikas 81
Ho Sang 69
Hamonic 83
Nelson 82
De Haan 82
Bailey 82
Conacher 82
Clutterbuck 82
Vis 81
hickey 80
lee 80

Halak 86
Johnson 82
Poulin 78

Everyone else is under 80 with no significant trade value. Im a but surprised they have MDC trade value higher than griff and strome. Anyway i am not complaining this year. fair enough

Click to read more...

 

[Jack de la Hoya]

Out of curiosity, is Nelson listed as LW or C?

Auto-lines are going to be interesting...

 

[Deadweight]

Out of curiosity, is Nelson listed as LW or C?

Auto-lines are going to be interesting...

Yeah nelson is listed as a center. Also for potential strome and dal colle have top 6 potential but cizikas has elite potential. Another thing I found interesting

 

[Jack de la Hoya]

Yeah nelson is listed as a center. Also for potential strome and dal colle have top 6 potential but cizikas has elite potential. Another thing I found interesting

That's...bizarre. (Also, Cizikas is elite, but S. Couturier is just top-six as well?)

 

[Deadweight]

 

[Jack de la Hoya]

Saw a youtube clip with the full roster.

Oddities: Hamonic "only" has a top-six ceiling, with a low probability of reaching it.

Cizikas has an elite ceiling, with a high probability of reaching it.

 

[seafoam]

Hamonic is too low, Conacher is too high, other than that, nothing too drastically bad.

 

[13th Floor]

For those of you interested in the ratings for EA NHL 15

Listed by Be a GM mode trade value:

Tavares 91
Okposo 88
Dal Colle 69
Reinhardt 76
Strome 81
Pulock 58
Nielsen 85
Grabovski 85
Grabner 84
Kulemin 84
Cizikas 81
Ho Sang 69
Hamonic 83
Nelson 82
De Haan 82
Bailey 82
Conacher 82
Clutterbuck 82
Vis 81
hickey 80
lee 80

Halak 86
Johnson 82
Poulin 78

Everyone else is under 80 with no significant trade value. Im a but surprised they have MDC trade value higher than griff and strome. Anyway i am not complaining this year. fair enough

Sorry, I must be slow, but I am confused.

"Everyone else under 80"... but there's people on that list under 80 (and as low as 58)?

"MDC higher than Griff and Strome"... MDC is 69, Reinhart is 76, Strome is 81.

What am I missing?

 

[Richie Daggers Crime]

Why is Bailey so low? They obviously didn't see his Corsi's while doing pushups with no shirt draped in chains %.

 

[2ndGenIslander]

Saw a youtube clip with the full roster.

Oddities: Hamonic "only" has a top-six ceiling, with a low probability of reaching it.

Cizikas has an elite ceiling, with a high probability of reaching it.

haha the guys over at EA must have just been watching highlights from the 2012-2013 playoff series. If Cizikas ends up being elite I would be beyond shocked...

 

[2ndGenIslander]

Hamonic is too low, Conacher is too high, other than that, nothing too drastically bad.

agreed, but watch conacher be a sleeper this year

 

[Kevin27NYI]

Hamonic should be 84-85. Lubo 83. Conacher should be 80. Kulemin and grabs 83.

 

[sebsisles]

Sorry, I must be slow, but I am confused.

"Everyone else under 80"... but there's people on that list under 80 (and as low as 58)?

"MDC higher than Griff and Strome"... MDC is 69, Reinhart is 76, Strome is 81.

What am I missing?

he said higher trade value, there is a difference between rating and trade value in the game

 

[13th Floor]

he said higher trade value, there is a difference between rating and trade value in the game

Ohhhh.. so that list is in trade value order, with the player's rating next to it. I thought that was the player's trade value rating.

Got it. I knew I as missing something.

 

[KrisBeKreame]

Where did you see the ratings?

 

[Deadweight]

Sorry, I must be slow, but I am confused.

"Everyone else under 80"... but there's people on that list under 80 (and as low as 58)?

"MDC higher than Griff and Strome"... MDC is 69, Reinhart is 76, Strome is 81.

What am I missing?

under 80 with no significant trade value

i just didnt want to list off people like mayfield pelech and VCR's overall when theyre obivously not going to turn into something special in the game.(not saying they wont in real life)


When Dal Colle has higher TRADE VALUE in the game.

sorry bout the confusion

 

[Deadweight]

Where did you see the ratings?

If you pay 5 dollars for ea access you get the game 5 days early(only xbox one)

 

[Deadweight]

Why is Bailey so low? They obviously didn't see his Corsi's while doing pushups with no shirt draped in chains %.

They probably watched too many isles games and didnt look at corsi

 

[landy92mack29]

how is pulock a 58?!? the way they rate prospects is stupid

 

[bstash19]

conacher is definitely too high. mid to high 70s (78) seems more appropriate.

 

[Jester9881]

The ratings for prospects are low, because they haven't reached their potential yet. That is why MDC as a 69 is listed higher than Nielsen as an 85..... his potential is probably at 86-87 (lower than Okposo who is an 88).

 

[dtrain24]

Clarkson, del Zotto and AMac are 85s or 84s I believe...talk about overrated.

 

[bigtim1988]

as an owner of EA nhl games from 2010-present, i find their rating system to be inconsistent. 2012 the ratings were a little inflated, 2013 they were nearly perfect; 2014 they deflated the ratings, and made the gameplay feel a little strange.

fun game nonetheless. many hours of "be a gm" mode will be played this winter

 

[TheWhiteWhale30]

Pulock being a 58 is a joke. Lol 18 points behind reinhart. Also I saw Halak on HUT and he was an 87. Unless someone applied a training to him idk.

 

[Isles5513]

For those of you interested in the ratings for EA NHL 15

Listed by Be a GM mode trade value:

Tavares 91
Okposo 88
Dal Colle 69
Reinhardt 76
Strome 81
Pulock 58
Nielsen 85
Grabovski 85
Grabner 84
Kulemin 84
Cizikas 81
Ho Sang 69
Hamonic 83
Nelson 82
De Haan 82
Bailey 82
Conacher 82
Clutterbuck 82
Vis 81
hickey 80
lee 80

Halak 86
Johnson 82
Poulin 78

Everyone else is under 80 with no significant trade value. Im a but surprised they have MDC trade value higher than griff and strome. Anyway i am not complaining this year. fair enough

Out of curiosity, what are the potentials of prospects like Ho-Sang ect? Also, is the potential rating the same or similar?