Let's try this again, but in a different way:
Does the league test for PEDs?
Do players still take them, even knowing they're going to be tested?
Do some people get caught?
Do some people get away with it?
Does it make sense to characterize those attempts to avoid detection as cheating?
Does this happen across the league and across all teams?
Simple yes or no for each question please.
Would you answer such a baited question, especially when limited to simple yes/no answer to some fairly complex questions?
But anyways. In the spirit of goodwill and cooperation:
I agree more or less with the take of a Pats fan who I quoted to agree with in this thread.
I believe BB and the Pats, like many other teams, try and find and exploit any advantage they can to help achieve their goals. BB is known for his attention to detail. No problem with that.
I believe Brady ended up having to play a game with some balls inflated over where he likes them and he let it be known that this was completely unacceptable. No problem with that.
I believe the ball guys took it upon themselves to do what they felt necessary to keep Brady happy. It starts to get a little blurry here but in the grand scheme no real problem.
I believe the circumstantial evidence is pretty compelling that the balls could very well have been tampered with after the official "inspection". That's goes over the line from gamesmanship for me.
However given the relatively minor impact of the offense I would have very quickly fined the Pats the 25k standard for ball tampering with as little fanfare as possible and moved on as quickly as possible.
I would then make damn sure the officials took the ball inspection seriously going forward and tighten up the process of putting the balls in play after the inspection.
I believe the league bungled the entire thing from beginning until most likely the end.
I do not believe the league did this out of spite or out of any sort of deflection motive. Maybe the Colts and/or the Ravens came from a spite angle to get it started but I don't believe they had enough pull to launch this fiasco without the support of the majority and I don't believe the majority has it in for the Pats enough to put their own integrity on the line. The NFL had to address the allegations and completely screwed the pooch with the way they handled it.
It is possible, like another poster theorized, that the other owners believed what they were initially told and fell in line but there was plenty of opportunity for them to reign this back in once it began to spiral into absurdityville.
So I guess in summary. The answer is technically yes. I believe it is likely that the ball guys, so by extension the Pats did "cheat" in a relatively minor way by tampering with the already inspected balls. I also believe the punishment is way out of line and it should have been as I stated above, 25k and lets move on. I don't believe the "cheating" played much if any role in their success and if it never came out and they keep on doing it.... so what. lets play ball.
I do believe BB is one of those guys who tip toes right up to that line often. He is a brilliant competitor and understands the sum of the little things that are meaningless on their own can add up to a substantial advantage over time. I respect and admire that about him.
I haven't said much here that can't be taken from my posts of the last few days but if this saves you some time then good enough.