RodTheBawd
Registered User
- Oct 16, 2013
- 5,529
- 8,604
voyageur is my new favorite poster
I started loading up the multi quotes until I realized I'd just get another infraction.
At the very least, I learned that stadia is plural for stadium.
voyageur is my new favorite poster
Not sure if this belongs here or in the Aho thread, but this is quite possibly Luke's most chipper piece about the Canes in years:
http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/luke-decock/article79181892.html
"Finland’s Sebastian Aho, center, and Canada’s Morgan Rilles"
lol
Think we'll sign Wesley?
What's his outlook anyway? 6th/7th guy? If he's anything like his old man seems like he'd at least be a guy you could call up and know he won't get you killed back there. Assuming that Jordan is gone, mainly because I can't conceive of any reason they would want to keep him.
Play for the hurricanes - get a job for life.
If Pitkanen really did sell the Canes on Aho (As suggested on the MB) then I would offer him a job ASAP too. Aho is vying for the Canes' best steal in recent history which is saying a lot when you have Faulk, Slavin, Rask, and Pesce in the mix.
From what I can gather he's a 6/7....in Charlotte.
Difference between recognizing talent and helping develop talent though. As good as Pitkanen was, he never struck me as the type that was technically sound and depended a lot on his size and skating to get around more than fundamentals. The guys on the staff now (Brindy, Wesley, Stillman) were all players that thrived on fundamentals and had a solid base to fall back on when things didn't go right. I always thought that was why Pitkanen was kind of up-and-down as a player, when he was going good things were great, but when he was going bad he was just a total disaster and didn't even look like he was playing the same game as everybody else.
I admit I could be completely off-base with this, it's just always the impression I had of him that he leaned mostly on natural ability.
Need to get him locked up long-term.
The most recent comparable I can find is Toffoli, he got 2 years, 6.5 million as an RFA last summer after a 23-goal, 49-point season. Would be nice to lock up Rask for 4-5 years, if possible, 3.25m/avg. seems like a steal to me.
A 4 year extension takes Rask to unrestricted free agency, I believe. A 5 year extension, thus, only buys out a year of unrestricted free agency. If a long-term extension is the direction the talks go in, I think GMRF would be wise to go for more in the way of team control (6-7 years.)
Thinking of a long-term 2nd contract, a comparable Middle 6 center is Nick Bjugstad.
http://www.generalfanager.com/players/882
Adam Henrique works as well.
http://www.generalfanager.com/players/1251
I wouldn't be upset with 6 years, $24-$25 mil for Rask.