hkydave04
Registered User
- Mar 8, 2016
- 52
- 31
Someone care to elaborate on if there are any actual scenarios posted in the article or is it just scare mongering for us? The league played roughly 7/8 of the season. It's pretty clear who the bad teams were and the vast majority of the clubs that weren't going to make the playoffs. Screwing with the draft in any significant way because teams played 70 instead of 80 games is just asinine.
Cant read this, it is behind a paywall. Is there a summary?
The worst from the Wings perspective is a proposed tournament for the non-playoff teams wherein the grand prize is the first overall pick. The suggestion from the authors is that the odds of winning the tournament would somehow be made to mirror the current odds of winning the lottery.
As someone else said earlier, we have already played 7/8s of the season and already know who the bad teams are.
One of the suggestions out there is to reduce the playoffs to the top four teams in each conference.
If there is a reduced format, I could see the NHL having all non-playoff teams entered in the draft lottery. Hopefully, they would not change the odds of the worst 4 or 5 teams.
I’d like the 1st pick but saying we deserve a reward for sucking so hard is a weird mentality. Maybe I’m just not used to it yet.We sucked for 90% of the season and to lose it for some stupid battle of the shit teams is bush league! We were historically bad and deserve the 1st pick.
I’d like the 1st pick but saying we deserve a reward for sucking so hard is a weird mentality. Maybe I’m just not used to it yet.
So the Wings would get a bye to the "conference championship" or something?
This is a dumb idea and whoever thought it up should feel bad. Play a loser tournament, but have it be an exhibition if you want more hockey. Do not put things that will affect the long term in the balance.
Information is behind a paywall I am good as long as we still get our top 4 pick. If something different happens whatever this is the price the organization pays for not rebuilding when it would have had better outcomes in the lottery.
No. Absolutely not. Price they pay? No, it would be incredibly ridiculous. Do not put this evil on the Wings. This isn't "hey, we made a bad call on a pick". This is "the NHL wants to do something incredibly stupid that we couldn't possibly have planned for". To be honest, it's a little bit like the original salary cap and the lockout in 2012. You'd be asking the Wings to divine the future.
What are they proposing I couldn't read the article?
Wings extending the streak put expansions getting thrown into the lottery and we were also out of the McDavid draft. I would say our bubble first round exits had a cost many are still in denial over. The urgency of need in this lottery is just another example.
Read a few posts up. Someone floated the idea of some sort of tournament for the crappy teams to compete in to determine draft pick.