Or look no further than being beat out of the first round year after year. The Blues have an excellent team and have the players/size to play that kind of game. The Blues are also excellent at drafting. Its easy to cherry pick Tarasenko as some sort project that Hitchcock made, the fact is he is a good player with very high skill, along with a great team around him. Why didn't Hitchcock turn MPS into gold?
The guy (Hitchcock) is a good coach, but your constant complaining over Nelson who has been excellent so far for the Oilers is troubling, you have nothing to support the complaining. In the last 10 games the Oilers have as good or better record than roughly 10 teams in the league, thats progress no matter how you try to crap on it. There is zero chance we make the playoffs and I don't expect anyone in their right mind expected that with the coaching change this year. I see no reason to start changing coaches again when its OBVIOUS Nelson is doing a better job and the players seem to be responding to him. Are you actually complaining about an Oiler coach having a winning record for a change, do you enjoy complaining about losing?
Because MPS was very much mishandled by the Oilers, like most of our other draft picks.
Nelson is doing a better job but is that really saying much? Eakins did so poorly it'd be impossible to do worse.
Let's examine the game last night. The Oilers played well after two periods and were full marks for the lead. Then in the span of less than half a period they turn a multi-goal lead into a deficit for the second game in a row. Maybe I'm just not convinced when our third periods have been consistently poor since Eakins was canned. I mean we were outscored 7-1 in the third period in the last two games, never mind just edging out Buffalo, who is by far the worst team in the league. The Oilers couldn't even make that game look easy.
The fact of the matter is that the Oilers are playing better by virtue of Eakins being so poor. We're probably hovering around Krueger range currently and that team still wasn't very good. Nelson is an upgrade on Eakins but even the common HFOil poster would've been an upgrade.
Had Eakins been canned in the off-season like he really should have been, we could've had access to Barry Trotz, or Laviolette, the latter of which is currently coaching the NHL's #1 team and is probably a lock for the Jack Adams. Going back to Eakins' hiring, Ruff, Maurice, and Vigneault were all available at that time and we went with an underexperienced AHLer.
Hitchcock to his credit has a ring. So does Bob Hartley. You think the Flames are nearly this good without his coaching experience? It really irritates me to give the Flames any credit but they made a smart hire in Hartley.
If the Oilers want Nelson to be an assistant and groom him into a head coach, that's perfectly fine by me. What I don't want is for this team to assume they've found the coach of the future because he's better than Eakins and for us to be staring at a lottery pick in November again.
This organization is incredibly stupid. Why is Nelson suddenly a smart hire when everything the Oilers have done within the past few years has been in the range of "mind-boggling" to "Hair-pullingly stupid"? I mean the PP is still godawful, the main difference being they're not giving up shorthanded breakaways anymore. They're still not scoring though. The PK is mediocre at best. The 5 on 5 play has improved but they still have many glaring defensive issues (evidenced by the fact the Sharks picked them apart in the third period, all at even strength).
Experience wins hockey games, something the Oilers are severely lacking in all organizational areas.