Well, obviously a multidimensional player would be better but, yeah, when the trick is good enough it's worth a lot. I think it's more about what's going on around said trick and if it's ultimately worth it for the team. It probably wasn't worth it for the Pens compared to Hornqvist + Spaling given their problems with depth, effort, not throwing hissy fits, their formula not working and other assorted problems. Maybe they could have fixed some of his effort problems but Sutter has gone complacent, Kunitz is being defiantly lazy and Adams has literally fought Malkin. So I wouldn't say that the new coaching staff is a guaranteed or even likely fix like I've seen thrown around.
I think the frustrating thing with Neal was that he'd sometimes show that he was more than that one trick and then he'd go back to his usual when the team needed him to be more. Him trying to make the Olympic team compared to after he didn't hurt. He was also here for the playoff collapses 2011-2014 (aka the really ugly ones where things started to sink in) and I think people may have formed a connection between the two, warranted or not. Couple that with a penchant for doing stupid **** and he makes an easy target.
That shot is glorious and he'll probably be a 'what if?' for idk how long going forward, though.