Montreal can barely fill an arena when they are mediocre? Umm what? it's the largest arena in the league at nearly 22,000 and those games for which they did not sell out still had around 20,000 people attending Canadiens games. It's not something to be concerned about considering the team has rarely been a legit Stanley Cup contender the past 2 decades, have some of the highest ticket prices in the league and have been a top-2 or 3 revenue for as long as we can remember despite a .75 Cndn dollar.
Vancouver has averaged 18,000 or more per game while rebuilding. They are still a top ten revenue team in the NHL despite stagnant ticket prices and a .75 dollar. Your "Vancouver looks Florida-esque" comment is ill-informed and foolish.
Vancouver Canucks [NHL] yearly attendance at hockeydb.com
Vancouver has 2.5 million in the metro, another 500,000 in the Fraser Valley and another 750,000 on the island. They currently have one team in the big-4 sports leagues. Montreal has 4 million in its metro and another couple million within 2 hours drive. They also only have one big-4 pro sports team.
Both markets are underserved and both would do as well or better than many proposed cities (ie. Kansas already saturated with Chiefs and Royals and little growth, barely 2 million, Louisville - small and half the size of Vancouver) and current cities (ie. Memphis - among lowest revenue generating teams in the league, small and poor, New Orleans - small, poor, no growth, losing superstars every 6 years...see Chris Paul, Anthony Davis, and in 6 years, likely Zion Williamson as well). Montreal would likely be a mid-revenue team befitting it's size, even with a .75 dollar. Vancouver would likely be lower-mid level...top 20 or so.
I'm not sure where you get these rumours of $2 billion expansion fees from because the more likely fees will be a $1 billion to $1.5 billion. Still a high price no doubt, but something I think a group in one of Montreal or Vancouver would be willing to pay given how lucrative the league's tv deals and international sponsorships are at this point. It's certainly is not a foolish financial risk at all given even the terrible franchises currently pull in $50 million in profits per year.
Actually, $2.5 billion expansion fee or $3.33 billion CAD.
NBA wants $2.5 billion fee for possible expansion teams; expects offers in Vegas and Seattle, per report
Teams in Canada would lose plenty of superstars as well. If Toronto has a hard time attracting superstars, then Montreal and Vancouver would to. Montreal and Toronto get plenty of cold and snow and all 3 Canadian teams would sit amongst the highest taxed cities in all of the NBA. Not a recipe for attracting NBA superstars.
What’s most important to a prospective owner is profit. Can that owner or owners recoup over $3 billion dollars with the revenue generated from their franchise? I’m extremely skeptical that any local owner would even take the risk with such an absurd price tag.
Finally, my statement was correct. Montreal is a huge metropolitan compared to other smaller NHL markets. To not fill a 22,000 seat arena in a hockey crazed market does not give me the confidence that an NBA team would work anywhere else in Canada once the honeymoon period is over.
By the way, here’s a picture of a Canucks game in the midst of their rebuild for your memory bank.