Vickers8
Guest
16-3-2, 1st 40 minutes of game played in Ranger zone, stupid penalties all game, Ribeiro, Neal and Gaustad are all *******s, Nash on fire, Hayes heating up. Hank has been sensational
Blues?
Dan Girardi is top 5 in the NHL in +-.
Okay I was wrong, we won. I can live with that.
Only saw the 3rd period, and was VERY impressed. We seemed to push the play, actually be the aggressor even though we had the lead. Maybe the Florida game lit a fire under their *****?
Judging by the other comments, I guess I didn't miss much by not watching the first 2 periods.
Either way, I wonder how many of you ranger fans have been around before the 04-05 lockout. Some of you are completely SPOILED, and are in for a rude awakening once we start the eventual decline. We're a good team. Enjoy it. It doesn't last forever (unless you're a patriots fan, in which case I hate you)
The crazy thing is you cannot have a record of 16-3-2 by accident.
By why does it sometimes feel that we could easily be 3-16-2?
This team is such an enigma:
I agree, if we are playing poorly and have such a great record, imagine what we are like when he are playing well?
BUT: I agree, our bad play and habits will eventually catch up with us.
Which is it? For the heck of me, I don't know.
I do think our lack of possession time is due to our forwards rather than poor play by our D. Despite all the Girardi and Staal hate, I think our D corp is fine. They are not the reason we are pinned in our own end. Our forwards inability to forecheck and create extended shifts in the offensive zone, ends up with possession going the other way and making our D look bad.
Sometimes I wish our D would not immediately look to make a pass to bring the puck out of the offensive zone to begin transition (I know that is AV's system) but give it to one of our centers to carry the puck.
I do know one thing....tomorrow's game against the Habs will be a good measuring stick and tell us exactly where we are.
Our shooting percentage isn't going to drop much if we keep generating quality looks. Nash had Rinne frozen last night in a situation where he has to cheat a little bit off the post to make sure he has a chance to make a save on a cross-seam one-timer, so Nash just rips it high short side. Staal megged someone to feed Stepan standing alone at the net mouth for a simple tap-in past Rinne.
Last night was all about how well we killed those penalties and capitalizing on the few chances we were able to generate
Our shooting percentage isn't going to drop much if we keep generating quality looks. Nash had Rinne frozen last night in a situation where he has to cheat a little bit off the post to make sure he has a chance to make a save on a cross-seam one-timer, so Nash just rips it high short side. Staal megged someone to feed Stepan standing alone at the net mouth for a simple tap-in past Rinne.
Last night was all about how well we killed those penalties and capitalizing on the few chances we were able to generate
This Rangers team reminds me of the Kings team that beat us 2 years ago. A clear deficiency in the top 6 heading into the trade deadline, and a less than complete defense. The Kings were above all resilient. A great goalie performance, a new found offensive game when one savvy buy low move to acquire Gaborik at the deadline put them over the top, and an understanding that not everyone on their defense was perfect and that they would need to over shift Doughty. They had several young guys, inconsistent, but offensively potent like Hayes and Miller. Seemingly, they'd either take a commanding lead early and coast the rest of the game, or would seem horribly overmatched in the first two periods (while somehow keeping a game close), only to crush the other team's soul and win in the 3rd.
Okay I was wrong, we won. I can live with that.
Only saw the 3rd period, and was VERY impressed. We seemed to push the play, actually be the aggressor even though we had the lead. Maybe the Florida game lit a fire under their *****?
Judging by the other comments, I guess I didn't miss much by not watching the first 2 periods.
Either way, I wonder how many of you ranger fans have been around before the 04-05 lockout. Some of you are completely SPOILED, and are in for a rude awakening once we start the eventual decline. We're a good team. Enjoy it. It doesn't last forever (unless you're a patriots fan, in which case I hate you)
Best game of the year by Staal?
This team is obviously more seasoned than that team. I agree that the defensive deficiencies are still obvious, however like you said a low key move for a solid #2RW is what can put this team over the top.
Staal + Etem for Atkinson Please. Sign a stop gap or get Diaz up here... Staal's not proving he's worth that contract. Send him to a team where he can actually play. Reality is this is a business, and though he has a NMC, if he continues to play like crap, then he's going to be sent packing.
This team is obviously more seasoned than that team. I agree that the defensive deficiencies are still obvious, however like you said a low key move for a solid #2RW is what can put this team over the top.
Staal + Etem for Atkinson Please. Sign a stop gap or get Diaz up here... Staal's not proving he's worth that contract. Send him to a team where he can actually play. Reality is this is a business, and though he has a NMC, if he continues to play like crap, then he's going to be sent packing.
Yes but you also have to consider that if you were a fan during the Dark Ages, you probably were during 1994 as well, a lot of us weren't. Although I do see that it's not just the younger fans who look as this year as sort of Cup or bust.This. ****ing this.
Yes but you also have to consider that if you were a fan during the Dark Ages, you probably were during 1994 as well, a lot of us weren't. Although I do see that it's not just the younger fans who look as this year as sort of Cup or bust.
This whole "ranger fans are spoiled and they're winning a lot so there's nothing to complain about" meme got old last year and it's still old this year