The metrics say that Cody Franson is a decent player who handles reduced ice time very well.
Why is that not possible?
Neither is corsi
The metrics say that Cody Franson is a decent player who handles reduced ice time very well.
Why is that not possible?
hol up guys lemme plug [insert player here] into a hero chart and square teh cube root of the corswick now i know everything about him. Lol don't question me you fools you can't even calculate that josh manson is best D in the league
/Machinebot
Key words.
What type of "decent" player needs "reduced ice time" to be decent...
Then why can't he find a steady job in the NHL? Is every NHL GM clueless?
My statement was in reference to advanced stats and you talk about production and ice time, what do you want me to tell you? You lost buddy?
Probably Karl Alzner
He's big and not particularly physical. That's a death sentence.
No, you're lost, because you think corsi is an advanced stat.
You literally count corsi like you count goals.
Probably Karl Alzner
You're really good at hiding behind your 1 liners, that's a neat talent.
You're really good at hiding behind your "some coach/GM disagrees with you" appeal to authority, and that talent sucks.
Dude up until a year ago you argued that Petry was by far better than Weber defensively, are you going to deny that? How can i take your opinion seriously when you make those type of statements?
Do you think Shattenkirk is a good defensive player because of his corsi?
Jason Demers must be an elite top pairing dman in the NHL, too bad Florida is trying to trade him and no one wants to take him.
Michael Kempny must be the best defensive dman in the NHL. Brendan Smith must be a top pairing level defensive dman, cmon man.
If you look at adv stats then Eichel is a regular NHL'er and Ristolainen isn't even an NHL caliber player.
Yes, Shattenkirk is a good defensive player.
Yes I think Petry is better defensively than Weber. I think a garbage can is better defensively than Weber.
Yes, Shattenkirk is a good defensive player.
I don't really care if you use that in your "lol corsi sux" agenda, because you'll find something to use anyway. So, knock yourself out.
Advanced stats has become the equivalent of a college stat flunkie trying to fit a trig dataset using a polynomial and thinking he's the **** because his super complicated 9th degree polynomial perfectly fits his 10 data points.
Wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't so overbearing despite constantly being proven to be ********* left and right.
Yes I think Petry is better defensively than Weber. I think a garbage can is better defensively than Weber.
Yes, Shattenkirk is a good defensive player.
I don't really care if you use that in your "lol corsi sux" agenda, because you'll find something to use anyway. So, knock yourself out.
You're really good at hiding behind your "some coach/GM disagrees with you" appeal to authority, and that talent sucks.
And how about your "experts suck" agenda?
So you don't agree with coaches, or GMs AND you think the defenseman who just finished 6th in Norris voting can't play defense. Does the fact that corsi voting comes in a spreadsheet not even do anything for you?
Still waiting for an eye-test expert to tell me where I'm wrong about Alzner.
Dan Girardi finished 6th in Norris voting once. That says all you need to know about the value of expert opinions.
Still waiting for an eye-test expert to tell me where I'm wrong about Alzner.
This seems like a lot of money for Alzner.