Scintillating10
Registered User
Mantha is way over rated.
Detroit fans don't want Domi.
Mantha is also extremely overrated.
Detroit fans don't want Domi.
Mantha is also extremely overrated.
i still dont think that gets it done, they are both still too unproven
Suzuki and +++a mantha trade doesn't start with domi,
it starts with a first round pick or suzuki, or KK, and then +++
one of those 3 would need to go the other way
I have a good laugh at this. Since when Mantha is a 80 points scorer? Actually Domi with 70+ points season is closer to 80 points than Mantha.a mantha trade doesn't start with domi,
it starts with a first round pick or suzuki, or KK, and then +++
one of those 3 would need to go the other way
I wouldn't give up suzuki, or KK let alone add.a mantha trade doesn't start with domi,
it starts with a first round pick or suzuki, or KK, and then +++
one of those 3 would need to go the other way
I wouldn't give up suzuki, or KK let alone add.
how about if we add caufield and our 1st?i still dont think that gets it done, they are both still too unproven
Come on .We all know that' s not near enough .We would have to at least add Gallagher and take a cap dump back from the Wings.how about if we add caufield and our 1st?
so Suzuki, kotkaniemi, caufield and our 1st? take your time
yeah that would be a problem. so can we modify it to just be suzuki and kotkaniemi?Mantha is a huge goalscoring winger that's borderline PPG right now. Problem is he's always injured. There is a difference of talent between him and Domi (yeah I agree, it's not enormous, but size + shot is the difference). But in term of value (what teams are looking for), it's not really close. I'm not even a big fan of Mantha, I find his effort level to be all over the place. Having said that, he's insanely valuable in GMs eyes, and for good reason.
let me think about itCome on .We all know that' s not near enough .We would have to at least add Gallagher and take a cap dump back from the Wings.
doubts eh? so when it comes to montreal's good young players, it's always " unproven" but I've noticed with other franchises on here, the value is projected a lot better for young players in trades. interestingIf Suzuki or KK were “proven” they would both by themselves be worth quite a bit more than Mantha. So yeah, it’s a gamble because they’re unproven but that’s likely the only way you’ll get a potential 1C other than drafting one.
By the way, I have very strong doubts if Montreal would move either one, even in their “unproven” state for Mantha, so that shows how they are valued by their organization.
Better hurry because rumors are the Oilers might pony up McDavid.let me think about it
dammit done! it's tough. i mean the guy has only played 80 games once and not in 3 years.. will be 26 and has never had more than 48 pts.Better hurry because rumors are the Oilers might pony up McDavid.
BUT,BUT just imagine if he did play more. He could hit 50 pts. Just Imagine 50 friggin pts.dammit done! it's tough. i mean the guy has only played 80 games once and not in 3 years.. will be 26 and has never had more than 48 pts.
lol. i'm dumber for having read this threadBUT,BUT just imagine if he did play more. He could hit 50 pts. Just Imagine 50 friggin pts.
too bad DeLaRose isn't in Detroit anymore because KK/Suzuki/Caufield and a first for MANTHA and DLR seems fair!how about if we add caufield and our 1st?
so Suzuki, kotkaniemi, caufield and our 1st? take your time
No what's dumber is a poster saying that Suzuki and Kotkaniemi wouldn't be enough for Mantha.lol. i'm dumber for having read this thread
how about if we add caufield and our 1st?
so Suzuki, kotkaniemi, caufield and our 1st? take your time
One is unlike the other...a mantha trade doesn't start with domi,
it starts with a first round pick or suzuki, or KK, and then +++
one of those 3 would need to go the other way
HF trade boards...No what's dumber is a poster saying that Suzuki and Kotkaniemi wouldn't be enough for Mantha.
What's even worst is that same poster actually means/ believes it.
i still dont think that gets it done, they are both still too unproven
Mantha is way over rated.
Thats like saying Jordan Weal+Victor Mete for 4th OA+Moritz Seider. You get 2 proven NHLers for mystery boxes.If Suzuki or KK were “proven” they would both by themselves be worth quite a bit more than Mantha. So yeah, it’s a gamble because they’re unproven but that’s likely the only way you’ll get a potential 1C other than drafting one.
By the way, I have very strong doubts if Montreal would move either one, even in their “unproven” state for Mantha, so that shows how they are valued by their organization.