Proposal: MTL - CAR - PIT

[FreeBobbyFarnham]

To MTL :
Victor Rask
Olli Maatta

To CAR :
Derrick Brassard
Max Pacioretty
David Schlemko

To PIT :
Justin Faulk
Haydn Fleury

Click to read more...

 

[vokiel]

That's a deal MTL does yes.

 

[NotOpie]

This is a joke right? Carolina doesn't need a #7 Defender (Schlemko), a 2nd/3rd line center (we've got that covered with Rask), and Faulk for Pacioretty isn't near the value we'd get for him traded on his own. Lastly, there's no way Carolina helps Pittsburgh's defense improve as a division rival. Frankly this proposal is embarrassing.

 

[Habsfann]

Montreal and Pitt would accept, Carolina declines especially if Patches doesn't agree to a extension

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

To MTL :
Victor Rask
Olli Maatta

To CAR :
Derrick Brassard
Max Pacioretty
David Schlemko

To PIT :
Justin Faulk
Haydn Fleury

No thanks from Carolina

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

Montreal and Pitt would accept, Carolina declines especially if Patches doesn't agree to a extention

We aren’t paying what it would cost to re-sign him at his age

 

[780il]

Don't think Carolina does it cause Paches isn't gonna sign there.

 

[Shockmaster]

Carolina gets screwed bad in that deal. Why would they give up Faulk and Fleury for 2 guys who will be free agents next July?

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

Carolina gets screwed bad in that deal. Why would they give up Faulk and Fleury for 2 guys who will be free agents next July?

Because we are here to help others?

 

[FreeBobbyFarnham]

Carolina gets screwed bad in that deal. Why would they give up Faulk and Fleury for 2 guys who will be free agents next July?

What if they agree to sign before the deal?

 

[go comets]

Why on Earth would Carolina want that pile of garbage for??????

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

What if they agree to sign before the deal?

We aren’t signing patches to the huge contract he’ll command at his age

And they aren’t signing before the deal

 

[FreeBobbyFarnham]

Because we are here to help others?

You're acting as if you're not getting quality pieces.

 

[NotOpie]

You're acting as if you're not getting quality pieces.

If you look at the "value" from Carolina's perspective....we're not. As was stated, we're not signing Patches to the huge contract he'll command, Brassard fills absolutely no need, and we've got equivalent LHDs to Schlemko in our system. There's no value to this deal for Carolina.

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

You're acting as if you're not getting quality pieces.

You are correct when you look at team needs and contracts and players ages.

 

[Halla]

damn what a haul for carolina to give up on pending UFAs
and they still dont have a 1C

bad proposal

 

[FreeBobbyFarnham]

You are correct when you look at team needs and contracts and players ages.

What would you rather have from either PIT or MTL?

I thought with the potential loss of Skinner you'd want to replace him with Pacioretty. Also Brassard is a clear upgrade over Rask. Granted they're soon to be UFAs, but CAR has plenty of money left to spend.

 

[FreeBobbyFarnham]

If you look at the "value" from Carolina's perspective....we're not. As was stated, we're not signing Patches to the huge contract he'll command, Brassard fills absolutely no need, and we've got equivalent LHDs to Schlemko in our system. There's no value to this deal for Carolina.

What would Fleury + Faulk cost us if we left MTL out of it?

 

[Jared Dunn]

I was confused why so many Canes fans were so passionately against this but I 100% thought that the Fleury listed was the one in the Habs system... yikes

 

[HOPE]

canes might get f***ed but it's not 2 players im interrested none the less for Montreal...

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

What would you rather have from either PIT or MTL?

I thought with the potential loss of Skinner you'd want to replace him with Pacioretty. Also Brassard is a clear upgrade over Rask. Granted they're soon to be UFAs, but CAR has plenty of money left to spend.

Canes aren't looking to trade for two guys that are UFAs in a year that will be 31 and 32 when their contracts expire and a bottom pairing LHD who is a UFA in 2 years that will be 32 in his next deal. It's an absolutely sucky deal for the Canes.

If you want Fleury, then I want Sprong.
If you want Faulk, then I want your 1st next year + + (and I don't know that that is because I don't know if you have what I'd want but I'm not willing to trade Faulk to the Pens for a discount). If you don't like it, then so be it.

Canes aren't looking for 30+ year olds that are UFAs to be.

 

[vokiel]

What if they agree to sign before the deal?

Then Montreal gets hosed.. lol

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

Then Montreal gets hosed.. lol

As do the Canes. We aren’t paying what it would take to sign patches at 31.

 

[Jared Dunn]

Also from a Habs perspective, I want younger pieces for Pacioretty. If Canes had any interest in him I'd look at something around Fleury/Bean+

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

Also from a Habs perspective, I want younger pieces for Pacioretty. If Canes had any interest in him I'd look at something around Fleury/Bean+

If the Canes are looking to trade Skinner, I doubt they are looking to trade Fleury/Bean (much less plus) for patches